Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579203›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Compulsory Vaccination for Healthcare Workers in Italy for the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Paola Frati, Raffaele La Russa, Nicola Di Fazio, Zoe Del Fante, Giuseppe Delogu, Vittorio Fineschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paola FratiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le del Verano 40, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-7965
Raffaele La RussaIstituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Neuromed, Via Atinense 18, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy.
Nicola Di FazioDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le del Verano 40, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Zoe Del FanteDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le del Verano 40, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe DeloguDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le del Verano 40, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Vittorio FineschiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le del Verano 40, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1686-3236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) judgement no. 116(2021) of 8 April 2021 establishes the principle of mandatory vaccination, indicating the criteria that national legislation must comply with, following the principle of non-interference in the private life of the individual. Vaccination for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection appears to be an essential requirement for providing healthcare assistance. The European experience with compulsory vaccinations, offers a composite panorama, as the strategy of some European countries is to make vaccinations compulsory, including financial penalties for non-compliance. As in other countries, there is a clear need for Italy to impose compulsory vaccination for healthcare workers, in response to a pressing social need to protect individual and public health, and above all as a defense for vulnerable subjects or patients, for whom health workers have a specific position of guarantee and trust. The Italian Republic provided for mandatory vaccinations for health professionals by Decree-Law of 1 April 2021 no. 44, to guarantee public health and adequate safety conditions. As stated by ECHR, the Italian State, despite having initially opted for recommendation as regards to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, had to adopt the mandatory system to achieve the highest possible degree of vaccination coverage among health professionals to guarantee the safety of treatments and protection of patients' health. We present the Italian situation on vaccine hesitation in healthcare workers, with updated epidemiological data as well as the doctrinaire, social, and political debate that is raging in Italy and Europe.

Indexed as

compulsory vaccinationhealthcare workersItalian legislationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34579203
PMCPMC8473178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.