Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579158›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2021

Associations between Digital Health Intervention Engagement and Dietary Intake: A Systematic Review.

Tessa Delaney, Matthew Mclaughlin, Alix Hall, Sze Lin Yoong, Alison Brown, Kate O'Brien, Julia Dray, Courtney Barnes, Jenna Hollis, Rebecca Wyse and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tessa DelaneySchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2756-4821
Matthew MclaughlinSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2870-8556
Alix HallSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-6110
Sze Lin YoongSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0836-017X
Alison BrownSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Kate O'BrienSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Julia DraySchool of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Courtney BarnesSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Jenna HollisSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Rebecca WyseSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
John WiggersSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Rachel SutherlandSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Luke WolfendenSchool of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a proliferation of digital health interventions (DHIs) targeting dietary intake. Despite their potential, the effectiveness of DHIs are thought to be dependent, in part, on user engagement. However, the relationship between engagement and the effectiveness of dietary DHIs is not well understood. The aim of this review is to describe the association between DHI engagement and dietary intake. A systematic search of four electronic databases and grey literature for records published before December 2019 was conducted. Studies were eligible if they examined a quantitative association between objective measures of engagement with a DHI (subjective experience or usage) and measures of dietary intake in adults (aged ≥18 years). From 10,653 citations, seven studies were included. Five studies included usage measures of engagement and two examined subjective experiences. Narrative synthesis, using vote counting, found mixed evidence of an association with usage measures (5 of 12 associations indicated a positive relationship, 7 were inconclusive) and no evidence regarding an association with subjective experience (both studies were inconclusive). The findings provide early evidence supporting an association between measures of usage and dietary intake; however, this was inconsistent. Further research examining the association between DHI engagement and dietary intake is warranted.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDietDigital TechnologyEatingFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInternet-Based InterventionMaleMiddle AgedNutritional SciencesPublic HealthTelemedicineYoung Adultadherencedietdigital behavior change interventiondigital health interventiondigital technologiesengagementnutritionpublic health nutrition

Identifiers

PMID34579158
PMCPMC8470016
OpenAlexW3199191767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.