Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34579111›Full record

ReviewNutrients2021

Bibliometric Analysis of Studies on Coffee/Caffeine and Sport.

Nicolás Contreras-Barraza, Héctor Madrid-Casaca, Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, Miguel Ángel Garcia-Gordillo, José C Adsuar, Alejandro Vega-Muñoz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. International society of sports nutrition position stand: coffee and sports performance.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Bibliometric Analysis of Nature-Based Therapy Research.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Fibromyalgia, Pain, and Physical Activity: A Bibliometric Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolás Contreras-BarrazaFacultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar 2531015, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-4398
Héctor Madrid-CasacaFacultad de Ciencias Económicas, Administrativas y Contables, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Tegucigalpa 11101, Honduras.
Guido Salazar-SepúlvedaDepartamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción 4090541, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4979-6869
Miguel Ángel Garcia-GordilloPublic Policy Observatory, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-1736-0996
José C AdsuarPromoting a Healthy Society Research Group (PHeSO), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7203-3168
Alejandro Vega-MuñozPublic Policy Observatory, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Santiago 7500912, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9427-2044

Funding

Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception APC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides an empirical overview of coffee/caffeine studies in relation to sport worldwide, an incipient but growing relationship that has existed since 1938, although systematized over time since 1999. The extracted articles were examined using a bibliometric approach based on data from 160 records stored in the Web of Science (JCR) between 1938 and August 2021, applying traditional bibliometric laws and using VOSviewer for data and metadata processing. Among the results, these articles highlight an exponential increase in scientific production in the last two decades, with a concentration in only 12 specific journals, the hegemony of the USA among the co-authorship networks of worldwide relevance, and the thematic and temporal segregation of the concepts under study. This article concludes a high fragmentation of the authors with the highest level of scientific production and an evolution of almost 20 years in relevant thematic topics, and a concurrent concentration in three large blocks: (1) coffee consumption and risk factors, (2) health and coffee consumption, and (3) metabolism and sport correlated with the intake of coffee, which are distanced in time, providing evidence of an evolution that gives way to the irruption of alternative visions in the relationship of coffee and caffeine with sport.

Indexed as

BibliometricsCoffeeSportsCaffeineHumansCaffeineCoffeebibliometricscaffeine effectscoffee consumptiondrinkable nutrientsenergy drinksmetabolismrisk factorssports healthsports performancesugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID34579111
PMCPMC8466917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.