Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34578962›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Wellness in the Schools: A Lunch Intervention Increases Fruit and Vegetable Consumption.

Pamela A Koch, Randi L Wolf, Raynika J Trent, Ian Yi Han Ang, Matthew Dallefeld, Elizabeth Tipton, Heewon L Gray, Laura Guerra, Jennifer Di Noia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pamela A KochDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7300-908X
Randi L WolfDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Raynika J TrentDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Ian Yi Han AngSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-3764
Matthew DallefeldDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Elizabeth TiptonDepartment of Statistics, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
Heewon L GrayCollege of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Laura GuerraDepartment of Health and Behavior Studies, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Jennifer Di NoiaDepartment of Sociology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ 07470, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6109-8895

Funding

Newman's Own no grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wellness in the Schools (WITS) is a national non-profit organization partnering with public schools to provide healthy, scratch cooked, less processed meals (called an Alternative Menu), and active recess. This study examined the effects of WITS programming on school lunch consumption, including fruit and vegetable intake, in second and third grade students in New York City public schools serving a high proportion of students from low-income households. The intervention was evaluated with a quasi-experimental, controlled design with 14 elementary schools (7 that had initiated WITS programming in fall 2015 and were designated as intervention schools, and 7 matched Control schools). School lunch consumption was assessed by anonymous observation using the System of Observational Cafeteria Assessment of Foods Eaten (SOCAFE) tool in the fall of 2015 (Time 0, early intervention) and the spring of 2016 (Time 1) and 2017 (Time 2). There were no baseline data. Data were also collected on the types of entrées served in the months of October, January, and April during the two school years of the study. Across time points, and relative to students in the Control schools, students in WITS schools ate more fruits and vegetables (units = cups): Time 0: Control 0.18 vs. WITS 0.28; Time 1: Control 0.25 vs. WITS 0.31; and Time 2: Control 0.19 vs. WITS 0.27;

Indexed as

DietFruitLunchSchool Health ServicesVegetablesChildFood PreferencesFood ServicesHumansNew York CitySchoolselementary schoolfood and nutrition education programmingfruit and vegetable consumptionschool-based interventionschool mealsschool wellness

Identifiers

PMID34578962
PMCPMC8466064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.