Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34578909›Full record

ArticleNutrients2021

Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Nutrients Intake of Pregnant Women in the South-East of Spain.

Daniel Hinojosa-Nogueira, Desirée Romero-Molina, María José Giménez-Asensio, Beatriz Gonzalez-Alzaga, Inmaculada Lopéz-Flores, Silvia Pastoriza de la Cueva, José Ángel Rufián-Henares, Antonio F Hernández, Marina Lacasaña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation and calibration of the Food Consumption Frequency Questionnaire for pregnant women.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel Hinojosa-NogueiraCentro de Investigación Biomédica, Departamento de Nutrición y Bromatología, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2604-3303
Desirée Romero-MolinaInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, 2, 18014 Granada, Spain.
María José Giménez-AsensioInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, 2, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Beatriz Gonzalez-AlzagaInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, 2, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Inmaculada Lopéz-FloresInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, 2, 18014 Granada, Spain.
Silvia Pastoriza de la CuevaCentro de Investigación Biomédica, Departamento de Nutrición y Bromatología, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
José Ángel Rufián-HenaresCentro de Investigación Biomédica, Departamento de Nutrición y Bromatología, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1428-4353
Antonio F HernándezInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, 2, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-5418
Marina LacasañaInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, 2, 18014 Granada, Spain.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/01559The European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) and the Regional Health Council of Andalusia (Spain) PI-045-2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper nutrition during pregnancy is pivotal to maintain good health for the child and the mother. This study evaluates the reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) designed to assess nutrient intake during pregnancy in the GENEIDA (Genetics, Early life Environmental Exposures and Infant Development in Andalusia) prospective birth cohort study. In addition, the nutrient intake was estimated and then compared with European guidelines and other studies. Diet information was collected from 690 pregnant women using a FFQ administered at two periods of pregnancy (used for the reproducibility study) and 24-h dietary recall (for the validity study). Statistical approaches included Spearman's correlation coefficient and percentage agreement, classifying women into the same or adjacent quintiles to assess reproducibility, and limits of agreement (LoA) to evaluate validity. In the study of reproducibility, significant correlations for nutrients adjusted for total energy had an average of 0.417. Moreover, the percentage of subjects classified in the same quintile for nutrient intakes were above 66%. In the validation study, the significant correlation for nutrients adjusted for total energy had an average of 0.272. Nevertheless, the percentage of results in the LoA was above 94%. Our results were similar to other studies suggesting that the FFQ used is a valid tool of collect dietary intakes for South-East Spanish pregnant women.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentAdultCohort StudiesDietDiet SurveysFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and Questionnaires24-h dietary recallsfood frequency questionnaireintakenutritionpregnant womenSpain

Identifiers

PMID34578909
PMCPMC8467594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.