Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34578873›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2021

The Influence of Prenatal DHA Supplementation on Individual Domains of Behavioral Functioning in School-Aged Children: Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jacqueline F Gould, Peter J Anderson, Lisa N Yelland, Robert A Gibson, Maria Makrides

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. DHA supplementation and pregnancy complications.Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline F GouldWomen and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, 72 King William Road, Adelaide 5006, Australia.
Peter J AndersonTurner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7430-868X
Lisa N YellandWomen and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, 72 King William Road, Adelaide 5006, Australia.
Robert A GibsonWomen and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, 72 King William Road, Adelaide 5006, Australia.
Maria MakridesWomen and Kids, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, 72 King William Road, Adelaide 5006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-541X
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) accumulates in the fetal brain during pregnancy and is thought to have a role in supporting neurodevelopment. We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in women with a singleton pregnancy who were <21 weeks' gestation at trial entry. Women were provided with 800 mg DHA/day or a placebo supplement from trial entry until birth. When children reached seven years of age, we invited parents to complete the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), and the Conners 3rd Edition Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Index to assess child behavior and behavioral manifestations of executive dysfunction. There were 543 parent-child pairs (85% of those eligible) that participated in the follow-up. Scores were worse in the DHA group than the placebo group for the BRIEF Global Executive, Behavioral Regulation and Metacognition Indexes, and the Shift, Inhibit, Monitor, Working Memory, and Organization of Materials scales, as well as for the Conners 3 ADHD index, and the SDQ Total Difficulties score, Hyperactivity/Inattention score, and Peer Relationship Problems score. In this healthy, largely term-born sample of children, prenatal DHA supplementation conferred no advantage to childhood behavior, and instead appeared to have an adverse effect on behavioral functioning, as assessed by standardized parental report scales.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityChildChild BehaviorDocosahexaenoic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsDocosahexaenoic Acidsbehaviorbehavioral problemsDHAomega-3 fatty acidsprenatalRCTsupplementation

Identifiers

PMID34578873
PMCPMC8472059
OpenAlexW3197731039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.