ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Importance of Molecular Data to Identify Fungal Plant Pathogens and Guidelines for Pathogenicity Testing Based on Koch's Postulates.
Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel Aureobasidium pullulans isolate for the biological control of Penicillium commune in potato decay and its optimization for enhanced antifungal activity using the Taguchi method.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- Identification and Biological Control ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative comparison of fungal genome assembly strategies using short and long reads from simulated and empirical sequencing data.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- MultifunctionalJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First Report and Biological Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Draft genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2026Article
- An Emerging Disease of Leaf Spot Caused by Paramyrothecium vignicola on Soybean in China.The plant pathology journal · 2026Article
- Antagonistic Mechanisms ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Culturable rhizospheric microbiota of Lactuca sativa cultivars during nutrient-film farming reveals potential biocontrol and plant-growth promoting traits against commonly infesting fungal pathogens.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Draft genome sequence data ofData in brief · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Germplasm Resistance in Several Soybean Accessions Against SoybeanPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Morpho-phylogenetic evidence uncovers new taxa of lignicolous freshwater Sordariomycetes from Yunnan and Guizhou provinces, China.MycoKeys · 2026Article
- Isolation, Identification and Prevention of Bacterial Spot Disease onJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- G × E Interaction and stability analysis to identify resistant mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes against Boeremia leaf spot using AMMI and GGE biplot analysis.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Toxicity Assay and Pathogenic Process Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Proteomics analysis revealed the activation and suppression of different host defense components challenged with mango leaf spot pathogen Alternaria alternata.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Unveiling Paramyrothecium kamalii (Stachybotryaceae) as a novel foliar fungal pathogen on Matourea azurea in Kerala, India, based on morpho-cultural, pathological and molecular phylogenetic evidences.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the Diversity and Ecological Dynamics of Palm Leaf Spotting Fungi-A Case Study on Ornamental Palms in Portugal.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Fungi are an essential component of any ecosystem, but they can also cause mild and severe plant diseases. Plant diseases are caused by a wide array of fungal groups that affect a diverse range of hosts with different tissue specificities. Fungi were previously named based only on morphology and, in many cases, host association, which has led to superfluous species names and synonyms. Morphology-based identification represents an important method for genus level identification and molecular data are important to accurately identify species. Accurate identification of fungal pathogens is vital as the scientific name links the knowledge concerning a species including the biology, host range, distribution, and potential risk of the pathogen, which are vital for effective control measures. Thus, in the modern era, a polyphasic approach is recommended when identifying fungal pathogens. It is also important to determine if the organism is capable of causing host damage, which usually relies on the application of Koch's postulates for fungal plant pathogens. The importance and the challenges of applying Koch's postulates are discussed. Bradford Hill criteria, which are generally used in establishing the cause of human disease, are briefly introduced. We provide guidelines for pathogenicity testing based on the implementation of modified Koch's postulates incorporating biological gradient, consistency, and plausibility criteria from Bradford Hill. We provide a set of protocols for fungal pathogenicity testing along with a severity score guide, which takes into consideration the depth of lesions. The application of a standard protocol for fungal pathogenicity testing and disease assessment in plants will enable inter-studies comparison, thus improving accuracy. When introducing novel plant pathogenic fungal species without proving the taxon is the causal agent using Koch's postulates, we advise the use of the term
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.