Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577779›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2021

Formulation of a Ceramic Ink for 3D Inkjet Printing.

Dennis Graf, Judith Jung, Thomas Hanemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dennis GrafLaboratory for Materials Processing, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
Judith JungInstitute for Applied Materials, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany.
Thomas HanemannLaboratory for Materials Processing, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-2094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its multi-material capabilities, 3D inkjet printing allows for the fabrication of components with functional elements which may significantly reduce the production steps. The potential to print electronics requires jettable polymer-ceramic composites for thermal management. In this study, a respective material was formulated by functionalizing submicron alumina particles by 3-(trimethoxysilyl)propylmethacrylate (MPS) and suspending them in a mixture of the oligourethane Genomer 4247 with two acrylate functionalities and a volatile solvent. Ink jetting tests were performed, as well as thermal conductance and mechanical property measurements. The material met the strict requirements of the printing technology, showing viscosities of around 16 mPa·s as a liquid. After solidification, it exhibited a ceramic content of 50 vol%, with a thermal conductance of 1 W/(m·K). The resulting values reflect the physical possibilities within the frame of the allowed tolerances set by the production method.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingceramic inksmaterial jettingpolymer-ceramic composites

Identifiers

PMID34577779
PMCPMC8467568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.