ArticleMicromachines2021
Lateral Deformation of Human Red Blood Cells by Optical Tweezers.
Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Blood Mechanical Intelligence: From Force Sensing to Precision Mechanomedicine.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- In vitro investigation of the mechanics of fixed red blood cells based on optical trap micromanipulation and image analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Mechanical Characterization of the Erythrocyte Membrane Using a Capacitor-Based Technique.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Analysis of Polarization Images in the Microphysical Blood Parameters Research for the Hematocrit Diagnostics.Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we studied the lateral deformation of human red blood cells (RBCs) during lateral indentation by an optically trapped silica bead with a diameter of 4.5 µm (Bangs Laboratories, Inc. Fishers, IN, USA). The images were captured using a CCD camera and the Boltzmann statistics method was used for force calibration. Using the Hertz model, we calculated and compared the elastic stiffness resulting from the lateral force, showing that the differences are important and that the force should be considered. Besides the lateral component, this setup also allowed us to examine the lateral cell-bead interaction. The mean values of the cell shear stiffness measured during indentation were 3.37 ± 0.40 µN/m for biconcave RBCs, 3.48 ± 0.23 µN/m for spherical RBCs, and 3.80 ± 0.22 µN/m for crenelated RBCs, respectively. These results show that this approach can be used as a routine method for RBC study, because it enabled us to manipulate the cell without contact with the wall.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.