Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577648›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2021

Fabrication of 3D Micro-Blades for the Cutting of Biological Structures in a Microfluidic Guillotine.

Saisneha Koppaka, Kevin S Zhang, Myra Kurosu Jalil, Lucas R Blauch, Sindy K Y Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A role for theMolecular biology of the cell · 2026
    Article
  2. Copying a soft lithography master mold using an inexpensive, hobby-use UV-curable resin.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. A role for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saisneha KoppakaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6635-677X
Kevin S ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Myra Kurosu JalilDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9363-4592
Lucas R BlauchDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Sindy K Y TangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1465-2432
Stanford University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1938109National Science Foundation DBI-1548297Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiatives Seed Grants Program (IIP) R10-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro-blade design is an important factor in the cutting of single cells and other biological structures. This paper describes the fabrication process of three-dimensional (3D) micro-blades for the cutting of single cells in a microfluidic "guillotine" intended for fundamental wound repair and regeneration studies. Our microfluidic guillotine consists of a fixed 3D micro-blade centered in a microchannel to bisect cells flowing through. We show that the Nanoscribe two-photon polymerization direct laser writing system is capable of fabricating complex 3D micro-blade geometries. However, structures made of the Nanoscribe IP-S resin have low adhesion to silicon, and they tend to peel off from the substrate after at most two times of replica molding in poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS). Our work demonstrates that the use of a secondary mold replicates Nanoscribe-printed features faithfully for at least 10 iterations. Finally, we show that complex micro-blade features can generate different degrees of cell wounding and cell survival rates compared with simple blades possessing a vertical cutting edge fabricated with conventional 2.5D photolithography. Our work lays the foundation for future applications in single cell analyses, wound repair and regeneration studies, as well as investigations of the physics of cutting and the interaction between the micro-blade and biological structures.

Indexed as

3D printingmicrofabricationmicrofluidic guillotinesingle cellwound healing

Identifiers

PMID34577648
PMCPMC8472695
OpenAlexW3193425870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.