ReviewMicromachines2021
Progress in Non-Traditional Processing for Fabricating Superhydrophobic Surfaces.
Review in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface Wettability Modeling and Predicting via Artificial Neural Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Engineering Wettability Transitions on Laser-Textured Shark Skin-Inspired Surfaces via Chemical Post-Processing Techniques.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Advances in the Fabrication and Characterization of Superhydrophobic Surfaces Inspired by the Lotus Leaf.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Facile Manufacture of Oxide-Free Cu Particles Coated with Oleic Acid by Electrical Discharge Machining.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Biology and nature: Bionic superhydrophobic surface and principle.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When the water droplets are on some superhydrophobic surfaces, the surface only needs to be inclined at a very small angle to make the water droplets roll off. Hence, building a superhydrophobic surface on the material substrate, especially the metal substrate, can effectively alleviate the problems of its inability to resist corrosion and easy icing during use, and it can also give it special functions such as self-cleaning, lubrication, and drag reduction. Therefore, this study reviews and summarizes the development trends in the fabrication of superhydrophobic surface materials by non-traditional processing techniques. First, the principle of the superhydrophobic surfaces fabricated by laser beam machining (LBM) is introduced, and the machining performances of the LBM process, such as femtosecond laser, picosecond laser, and nanosecond laser, for fabricating the surfaces are compared and summarized. Second, the principle and the machining performances of the electrical discharge machining (EDM), for fabricating the superhydrophobic surfaces, are reviewed and compared, respectively. Third, the machining performances to fabricate the superhydrophobic surfaces by the electrochemical machining (ECM), including electrochemical oxidation process and electrochemical reduction process, are reviewed and grouped by materials fabricated. Lastly, other non-traditional machining processes for fabricating superhydrophobic surfaces, such as ultrasonic machining (USM), water jet machining (WJM), and plasma spraying machining (PSM), are compared and summarized. Moreover, the advantage and disadvantage of the above mentioned non-traditional machining processes are discussed. Thereafter, the prospect of non-traditional machining for fabricating the desired superhydrophobic surfaces is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.