Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577634›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Manufacturing Bacteriophages (Part 1 of 2): Cell Line Development, Upstream, and Downstream Considerations.

Tayfun Tanir, Marvin Orellana, Aster Escalante, Carolina Moraes de Souza, Michael S Koeris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tayfun TanirAmgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Keck Graduate Institute, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
Marvin OrellanaAmgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Keck Graduate Institute, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
Aster EscalanteAmgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Keck Graduate Institute, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
Carolina Moraes de SouzaAmgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Keck Graduate Institute, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.
Michael S KoerisAmgen Bioprocessing Center, Department of Biological Engineering and Management, Keck Graduate Institute, Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Claremont, CA 91711, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within this first part of the two-part series on phage manufacturing, we will give an overview of the process leading to bacteriophages as a drug substance, before covering the formulation into a drug product in the second part. The principal goal is to provide the reader with a comprehensive framework of the challenges and opportunities that present themselves when developing manufacturing processes for bacteriophage-based products. We will examine cell line development for manufacture, upstream and downstream processes, while also covering the additional opportunities that engineered bacteriophages present.

Indexed as

bacteriophagecell line developmentdownstream processingdrug productdrug substancemanufacturingupstream processing

Identifiers

PMID34577634
PMCPMC8471501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.