Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577471›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Non-Invasive Hemodynamics Monitoring System Based on Electrocardiography via Deep Convolutional Autoencoder.

Muammar Sadrawi, Yin-Tsong Lin, Chien-Hung Lin, Bhekumuzi Mathunjwa, Ho-Tsung Hsin, Shou-Zen Fan, Maysam F Abbod, Jiann-Shing Shieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muammar SadrawiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan.
Yin-Tsong LinAI R&D Department, New Era AI Robotic Inc., Taipei 105, Taiwan.
Chien-Hung LinAI R&D Department, New Era AI Robotic Inc., Taipei 105, Taiwan.
Bhekumuzi MathunjwaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan.
Ho-Tsung HsinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan.
Shou-Zen FanDepartment of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Maysam F AbbodDepartment of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8515-7933
Jiann-Shing ShiehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates cardiovascular and cerebral hemodynamics systems by only using non-invasive electrocardiography (ECG) signals. The Massachusetts General Hospital/Marquette Foundation (MGH/MF) and Cerebral Hemodynamic Autoregulatory Information System Database (CHARIS DB) from the PhysioNet database are used for cardiovascular and cerebral hemodynamics, respectively. For cardiovascular hemodynamics, the ECG is used for generating the arterial blood pressure (ABP), central venous pressure (CVP), and pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP). Meanwhile, for cerebral hemodynamics, the ECG is utilized for the intracranial pressure (ICP) generator. A deep convolutional autoencoder system is applied for this study. The cross-validation method with Pearson's linear correlation (R), root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) are measured for the evaluations. Initially, the ECG is used to generate the cardiovascular waveform. For the ABP system-the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP)-the R evaluations are 0.894 ± 0.004 and 0.881 ± 0.005, respectively. The MAE evaluations for SBP and DBP are, respectively, 6.645 ± 0.353 mmHg and 3.210 ± 0.104 mmHg. Furthermore, for the PAP system-the systolic and diastolic pressures-the R evaluations are 0.864 ± 0.003 mmHg and 0.817 ± 0.006 mmHg, respectively. The MAE evaluations for systolic and diastolic pressures are, respectively, 3.847 ± 0.136 mmHg and 2.964 ± 0.181 mmHg. Meanwhile, the mean CVP evaluations are 0.916 ± 0.001, 2.220 ± 0.039 mmHg, and 1.329 ± 0.036 mmHg, respectively, for R, RMSE, and MAE. For the mean ICP evaluation in cerebral hemodynamics, the R and MAE evaluations are 0.914 ± 0.003 and 2.404 ± 0.043 mmHg, respectively. This study, as a proof of concept, concludes that the non-invasive cardiovascular and cerebral hemodynamics systems can be potentially investigated by only using the ECG signal.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationElectrocardiographyBlood PressureHemodynamicsNeural Networks, Computerarterial blood pressurecentral venous pressuredeep convolutional autoencoderelectrocardiographyhemodynamicsintracranial pressurenon-invasive systempulmonary arterial pressure

Identifiers

PMID34577471
PMCPMC8469191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.