Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577455›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

AI-Assisted In-House Power Monitoring for the Detection of Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.

Yuriko Nakaoku, Soshiro Ogata, Shunsuke Murata, Makoto Nishimori, Masafumi Ihara, Koji Iihara, Misa Takegami, Kunihiro Nishimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuriko NakaokuDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita 564-8565, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-574X
Soshiro OgataDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita 564-8565, Japan.
Shunsuke MurataDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita 564-8565, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1670-020X
Makoto NishimoriDivision of Epidemiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Japan.
Masafumi IharaDepartment of Neurology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita 564-8565, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7102-4048
Koji IiharaNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita 564-8565, Japan.
Misa TakegamiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita 564-8565, Japan.
Kunihiro NishimuraDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita 564-8565, Japan.

Funding

Cardiovascular Disease of the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center 21-1-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-home monitoring systems have been used to detect cognitive decline in older adults by allowing continuous monitoring of routine activities. In this study, we investigated whether unobtrusive in-house power monitoring technologies could be used to predict cognitive impairment. A total of 94 older adults aged ≥65 years were enrolled in this study. Generalized linear mixed models with subject-specific random intercepts were used to evaluate differences in the usage time of home appliances between people with and without cognitive impairment. Three independent power monitoring parameters representing activity behavior were found to be associated with cognitive impairment. Representative values of mean differences between those with cognitive impairment relative to those without were -13.5 min for induction heating in the spring, -1.80 min for microwave oven in the winter, and -0.82 h for air conditioner in the winter. We developed two prediction models for cognitive impairment, one with power monitoring data and the other without, and found that the former had better predictive ability (accuracy, 0.82; sensitivity, 0.48; specificity, 0.96) compared to the latter (accuracy, 0.76; sensitivity, 0.30; specificity, 0.95). In summary, in-house power monitoring technologies can be used to detect cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionAgedArtificial IntelligenceComputersHumansLinear Modelscognitive impairmentdementiain-house monitoringpower monitoring

Identifiers

PMID34577455
PMCPMC8473035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.