Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577417›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Robot-Assisted Gait Self-Training: Assessing the Level Achieved.

Andrea Scheidig, Benjamin Schütz, Thanh Quang Trinh, Alexander Vorndran, Anke Mayfarth, Christian Sternitzke, Eric Röhner, Horst-Michael Gross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea ScheidigNeuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, Ilmenau University of Technology, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-7326
Benjamin SchützNeuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, Ilmenau University of Technology, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany.
Thanh Quang TrinhNeuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, Ilmenau University of Technology, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany.
Alexander VorndranNeuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, Ilmenau University of Technology, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-3062
Anke MayfarthMetraLabs GmbH, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Christian Sternitzketediro GmbH, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5201-826X
Eric RöhnerOrthopedic Department of the Waldkliniken Eisenberg, University Hospital Jena, 07607 Eisenberg, Germany.
Horst-Michael GrossNeuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, Ilmenau University of Technology, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany.

Funding

Thüringer Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Digitale Gesellschaft 2015 FE 9088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents the technological status of robot-assisted gait self-training under real clinical environment conditions. A successful rehabilitation after surgery in hip endoprosthetics comprises self-training of the lessons taught by physiotherapists. While doing this, immediate feedback to the patient about deviations from the expected physiological gait pattern during training is important. Hence, the Socially Assistive Robot (SAR) developed for this type of training employs task-specific, user-centered navigation and autonomous, real-time gait feature classification techniques to enrich the self-training through companionship and timely corrective feedback. The evaluation of the system took place during user tests in a hospital from the point of view of technical benchmarking, considering the therapists' and patients' point of view with regard to training motivation and from the point of view of initial findings on medical efficacy as a prerequisite from an economic perspective. In this paper, the following research questions were primarily considered: Does the level of technology achieved enable autonomous use in everyday clinical practice? Has the gait pattern of patients who used additional robot-assisted gait self-training for several days been changed or improved compared to patients without this training? How does the use of a SAR-based self-training robot affect the motivation of the patients?

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipExercise TherapyGaitHumansMotivationRoboticsautonomous usefeedback to the patientreal clinical environment conditionsrobot-assisted gait trainingself-training

Identifiers

PMID34577417
PMCPMC8470295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.