Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577388›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Photo-Realistic Image Dehazing and Verifying Networks via Complementary Adversarial Learning.

Joongchol Shin, Joonki Paik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joongchol ShinDepartment of Image, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.
Joonki PaikDepartment of Image, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8593-7155

Funding

Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning 2021-0-01341National R&D Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) 2020M3F6A1110350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical model-based dehazing methods cannot, in general, avoid environmental variables and undesired artifacts such as non-collected illuminance, halo and saturation since it is difficult to accurately estimate the amount of the illuminance, light transmission and airlight. Furthermore, the haze model estimation process requires very high computational complexity. To solve this problem by directly estimating the radiance of the haze images, we present a novel dehazing and verifying network (DVNet). In the dehazing procedure, we enhanced the clean images by using a correction network (CNet), which uses the ground truth to learn the haze network. Haze images are then restored through a haze network (HNet). Furthermore, a verifying method verifies the error of both CNet and HNet using a self-supervised learning method. Finally, the proposed complementary adversarial learning method can produce results more naturally. Note that the proposed discriminator and generators (HNet & CNet) can be learned via an unpaired dataset. Overall, the proposed DVNet can generate a better dehazed result than state-of-the-art approaches under various hazy conditions. Experimental results show that the DVNet outperforms state-of-the-art dehazing methods in most cases.

Indexed as

CNNdehazingGAN

Identifiers

PMID34577388
PMCPMC8471053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.