Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34577284›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

On the Complementarity of Sparse L0 and CEL0 Regularized Loss Landscapes for DOA Estimation.

Alice Delmer, Anne Ferréol, Pascal Larzabal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alice DelmerThales, 92230 Gennevilliers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2276-7072
Anne FerréolThales, 92230 Gennevilliers, France.
Pascal LarzabalSATIE, ENS Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie 2018/0698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

L0 sparse methods are not widespread in Direction-Of-Arrival (DOA) estimation yet, despite their potential superiority over classical methods in difficult scenarios. This comes from the difficulties encountered for global optimization on hill-climbing error surfaces. In this paper, we explore the loss landscapes of L0 and Continuous Exact L0 (CEL0) regularized problems in order to design a new optimization scheme. As expected, we observe that the recently introduced CEL0 penalty leads to an error surface with less local minima than the L0 one. This property explains the good behavior of the CEL0-regularized sparse DOA estimation problem for well-separated sources. Unfortunately, CEL0-regularized landscape enlarges L0-basins in the middle of close sources, and CEL0 methods are thus unable to resolve two close sources. Consequently, we propose to alternate between both error surfaces to increase the probability of reaching the global solution. Experiments show that the proposed approach offers better performance than existing ones, and particularly an enhanced resolution limit.

Indexed as

direction-of-arrivalL0 regularizationloss landscapesnonconvex regularizationsparse modeling

Identifiers

PMID34577284
PMCPMC8468343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.