Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34576756›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2021

Can Bacterial Endophytes Be Used as a Promising Bio-Inoculant for the Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Crop Plants?-A Global Meta-Analysis of the Last Decade (2011-2020).

Muhammad Aammar Tufail, Ana Bejarano, Awais Shakoor, Asif Naeem, Muhammad Saleem Arif, Afzal Ahmed Dar, Taimoor Hassan Farooq, Ilaria Pertot, Gerardo Puopolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. AMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammad Aammar TufailDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Via Mesiano 77, 38123 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2795-4985
Ana BejaranoCenter Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, Via E. Mach 1, 38098 San Michele all'Adige, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9021-1279
Awais ShakoorDepartment of Environment and Soil Sciences, University of Lleida, Avinguda Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-4500
Asif NaeemInstitute of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Kiel University, Hermann-Rodewald-Strasse 2, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Muhammad Saleem ArifDepartment of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1247-0539
Afzal Ahmed DarSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, Xian 710000, China.
Taimoor Hassan FarooqBangor College China, a Joint Unit of Bangor University and Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5478-1533
Ilaria PertotCenter Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, Via E. Mach 1, 38098 San Michele all'Adige, Italy.
Gerardo PuopoloCenter Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, Via E. Mach 1, 38098 San Michele all'Adige, Italy.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 722642H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 797028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil salinity is a major problem affecting crop production worldwide. Lately, there have been great research efforts in increasing the salt tolerance of plants through the inoculation of plant growth-promoting endophytic bacteria. However, their ability to promote plant growth under no-stress and salinity-stress conditions remains largely uncertain. Here, we carried out a global meta-analysis to quantify the plant growth-promoting effects (improvement of morphological attributes, photosynthetic capacity, antioxidative ability, and ion homeostasis) of endophytic bacteria in plants under no-stress and salinity-stress conditions. In addition, we elucidated the underlying mechanisms of growth promotion in salt-sensitive (SS) and salt-tolerant (ST) plants derived from the interaction with endophytic bacteria under no-stress and salinity-stress conditions. Specifically, this work encompassed 42 peer-reviewed articles, a total of 77 experiments, and 24 different bacterial genera. On average, endophytic bacterial inoculation increased morphological parameters. Moreover, the effect of endophytic bacteria on the total dry biomass, number of leaves, root length, shoot length, and germination rate was generally greater under salinity-stress conditions than no-stress conditions. On a physiological level, the relative better performance of the bacterial inoculants under the salinity-stress condition was associated with the increase in total chlorophyll and chlorophyll-b, as well as with the decrease of 1-aminocylopropane-1-carboxylate concentration. Moreover, under the salinity-stress condition, bacterial inoculation conferred a significantly higher increase in root K

Indexed as

antioxidant systemmeta-analysisosmoregulationphotosynthetic capacityplant growth-promoting endophytic bacteriasalinity stress

Identifiers

PMID34576756
PMCPMC8467090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.