Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34576721›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2021

A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Pre-Harvest Meat Safety Interventions in Pig Herds to Control

Maria Rodrigues da Costa, Joana Pessoa, Diana Meemken, Truls Nesbakken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biosecurity measures reducingFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Impact of Farm Management Practices onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prevalence and Risk Factors forVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Activity of a Bacteriophage Cocktail to ControlPHAGE (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) during animal transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Rodrigues da CostaEpidemiology Research Unit, Department of Veterinary and Animal Science, Northern Faculty, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), An Lòchran, 10 Inverness Campus, Inverness IV2 5NA, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2152-4009
Joana PessoaPig Development Department, Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 C997 Co. Cork, Ireland.
Diana MeemkenInstitute of Food Hygiene and Food Safety, Freie Universität Berlin, Working Group Meat Hygiene, Königsweg 67, D-14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4824-048X
Truls NesbakkenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of pre-harvest interventions to control the main foodborne pathogens in pork in the European Union. A total of 1180 studies were retrieved from PubMed

Indexed as

farm practicesfoodborne pathogenspig productionporkpre-harvest interventionssalmonellazoonoses

Identifiers

PMID34576721
PMCPMC8466550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.