ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Three-Dimensional Printed Foot Orthosis for Flexible Flatfoot: An Exploratory Biomechanical Study on Arch Support Reinforcement and Undercut.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The current state of 3D-printed orthoses clinical outcomes: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- AI-Enhanced Modular Material Selection for Patient-Specific Diabetic Insoles via Silicone Molding.Human factors · 2026Article
- Analysis of 3D printed longitudinal Flatfoot pads with lattice structures using various microfoaming filament.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Orthotic Insoles on Gait Biomechanics in Runners With Flatfoot Under Different Gait Loads.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2026Article
- Dual Transverse Arch Foot Orthosis Improves Gait Biomechanics in Females with Flexible Flatfoot.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Efficacy of 3D-Printed Insoles in Managing Common Foot Conditions: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Effect of orthopedic insoles on lower limb motion kinematics and kinetics in adults with flat foot: a systematic review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- The effect of foot posture on static balance, ankle and knee proprioception in 18-to-25-year-old female student: a cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Really Asymptomatic? Health-Related Quality of Life and Objective Clinical Foot Characteristics among 5-10-Year-Old Children with a Flexible FlatFoot.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Effect of Different Foot Orthosis Inverted Angles on Walking Kinematics in Females with Flexible Flatfeet.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Article
- Response to the letter to editor regarding "finite element analysis of subtalar joint arthroereisis on adult acquired flexible flatfoot deformity using customized sinus tarsi implant".Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2022Article
- Additive Manufacturing of Spinal Braces: Evaluation of Production Process and Postural Stability in Patients with Scoliosis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Different Design Feature Combinations of Flatfoot Orthosis on Plantar Fascia Strain and Plantar Pressure: A Muscle-Driven Finite Element Analysis With Taguchi Method.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The advancement of 3D printing and scanning technology enables the digitalization and customization of foot orthosis with better accuracy. However, customized insoles require rectification to direct control and/or correct foot deformity, particularly flatfoot. In this exploratory study, we aimed at two design rectification features (arch stiffness and arch height) using three sets of customized 3D-printed arch support insoles (R+U+, R+U-, and R-U+). The arch support stiffness could be with or without reinforcement (R+/-) and the arch height may or may not have an additional elevation, undercutting (U+/-), which were compared to the control (no insole). Ten collegiate participants (four males and six females) with flexible flatfoot were recruited for gait analysis on foot kinematics, vertical ground reaction force, and plantar pressure parameters. A randomized crossover trial was conducted on the four conditions and analyzed using the Friedman test with pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Compared to the control, there were significant increases in peak ankle dorsiflexion and peak pressure at the medial midfoot region, accompanied by a significant reduction in peak pressure at the hindfoot region for the insole conditions. In addition, the insoles tended to control hindfoot eversion and forefoot abduction though the effects were not significant. An insole with stronger support features (R+U+) did not necessarily produce more favorable outcomes, probably due to over-cutting or impingement. The outcome of this study provides additional data to assist the design rectification process. Future studies should consider a larger sample size with stratified flatfoot features and covariating ankle flexibility while incorporating more design features, particularly medial insole postings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.