ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Therapeutic Efficacy of Artificial Skin Produced by 3D Bioprinting.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioprinting revolution: Innovative design of 3D bioactive scaffolds for living organs and transdermal tissues.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Advancements in 3D skin bioprinting: processes, bioinks, applications and sensor integration.International journal of extreme manufacturing · 2025Review
- Sculpting the future: A narrative review of 3D printing in plastic surgery and prosthetic devices.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Hydrogel-mediated extracellular vesicles for enhanced wound healing: the latest progress, and their prospects for 3D bioprinting.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Functional acellular matrix for tissue repair.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Functional materials of 3D bioprinting for wound dressings and skin tissue engineering applications: A review.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Review
- In Vitro and In Vivo Characterization Methods for Evaluation of Modern Wound Dressings.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Cellular Interaction of Human Skin Cells towards Natural Bioink via 3D-Bioprinting Technologies for Chronic Wound: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Natural polymer-based scaffolds for soft tissue repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- An Overview of Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The skin protects the body from external barriers. Certain limitations exist in the development of technologies to rapidly prepare skin substitutes that are therapeutically effective in surgeries involving extensive burns and skin transplantation. Herein, we fabricated a structure similar to the skin layer by using skin-derived decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) with bioink, keratinocytes, and fibroblasts using 3D-printing technology. The therapeutic effects of the produced skin were analyzed using a chimney model that mimicked the human wound-healing process. The 3D-printed skin substitutes exhibited rapid re-epithelialization and superior tissue regeneration effects compared to the control group. These results are expected to aid the development of technologies that can provide customized skin-replacement tissues produced easily and quickly via 3D-printing technology to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.