Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34576150›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

The Effects of Three Chlorhexidine-Based Mouthwashes on Human Osteoblast-Like SaOS-2 Cells. An In Vitro Study.

Giulia Brunello, Kathrin Becker, Luisa Scotti, Dieter Drescher, Jürgen Becker, Gordon John

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giulia BrunelloDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1436-0085
Kathrin BeckerDepartment of Orthodontics, University Clinic of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-4683
Luisa ScottiDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Dieter DrescherDepartment of Orthodontics, University Clinic of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jürgen BeckerDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9499-344X
Gordon JohnDepartment of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9952-0262
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several decontamination methods for removing biofilm from implant surfaces during surgical peri-implantitis treatment have been reported, including the intraoperative usage of chlorhexidine (CHX)-based antiseptics. There is a lack of information on possible adverse effects on bone healing. The study aimed to examine the impact of three CHX-based mouthwashes on osteoblast-like cells (SaOS-2) in vitro. Cells were cultured for three days in 96-well binding plates. Each well was randomly treated for either 30, 60 or 120 s with 0.05% CHX combined with 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), 0.1% CHX, 0.2% CHX or sterile saline (NaCl) as control. Cell viability, cytotoxicity and apoptosis were assessed at day 0, 3 and 6. Cell viability resulted in being higher in the control group at all time points. At day 0, the CHX 0.2 group showed significantly higher cytotoxicity values compared to CHX 0.1 (30 s), CHX + CPC (30 s, 60 s and 120 s) and control (60 s and 120 s), while no significant differences were identified between CHX + CPC and both CHX 0.1 and NaCl groups. All test mouthwashes were found to induce apoptosis to a lower extent compared to control. Results indicate that 0.2% CHX presented the highest cytotoxic effect. Therefore, its intraoperative use should be carefully considered.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell LineCell SurvivalChlorhexidineHumansMouthwashesOsteoblastsChlorhexidineMouthwashesantisepticbonecetylpyridinium chloridechlorhexidinemouthrinseperi-implantitisperiodontitis

Identifiers

PMID34576150
PMCPMC8470316
OpenAlexW3199109027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.