Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34576146›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Comprehensive Survey of Recent Drug Discovery Using Deep Learning.

Jintae Kim, Sera Park, Dongbo Min, Wankyu Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Investigation ofIn silico pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Improved Prediction of Ligand-Protein Binding Affinities by Meta-modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jintae KimKaiPharm Co., Ltd., Seoul 03759, Korea.
Sera ParkKaiPharm Co., Ltd., Seoul 03759, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6957-4502
Dongbo MinComputer Vision Lab, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea.
Wankyu KimKaiPharm Co., Ltd., Seoul 03759, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3181-0594

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2017M3C9A5028690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery based on artificial intelligence has been in the spotlight recently as it significantly reduces the time and cost required for developing novel drugs. With the advancement of deep learning (DL) technology and the growth of drug-related data, numerous deep-learning-based methodologies are emerging at all steps of drug development processes. In particular, pharmaceutical chemists have faced significant issues with regard to selecting and designing potential drugs for a target of interest to enter preclinical testing. The two major challenges are prediction of interactions between drugs and druggable targets and generation of novel molecular structures suitable for a target of interest. Therefore, we reviewed recent deep-learning applications in drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction and de novo drug design. In addition, we introduce a comprehensive summary of a variety of drug and protein representations, DL models, and commonly used benchmark datasets or tools for model training and testing. Finally, we present the remaining challenges for the promising future of DL-based DTI prediction and de novo drug design.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDrug DiscoverySurveys and QuestionnairesAnimalsDrug DesignDrug DevelopmentHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparationsartificial intelligence-based drug discoverybenchmark tooldeep learningde novo drug designdrug–target interactionmolecular representationvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID34576146
PMCPMC8470987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.