ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021
Comparative Analysis of Chromatin-Delivered Biomarkers in the Monitoring of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Pilot Study.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell-free DNA as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Circulating Nucleosomes are Elevated in Trauma Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Prospective Case-Cohort Study.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Article
- Emerging biomodels to understand the pathophysiology of sepsis and evaluate new therapeutic strategies targeting extracellular histones.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Citrullinated histone H3 and procalcitonin in the diagnosis and predicting the outcome of septic shock.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Overcoming Multidrug Resistance Using DNA-Localized Auger Emitters: A Comparative Analysis of Radiotoxicity in Breast Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Endocytosis and non-canonical autophagy mediate extracellular histones cytotoxicity in vascular models of sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Circulating Nucleosomes as a Novel Biomarker for Sepsis: A Scoping Review.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- [Research advances of sepsis biomarkers].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023Review
- Validation of circulating histone detection by mass spectrometry for early diagnosis, prognosis, and management of critically ill septic patients.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Early Changes and Predictive Value of Serum Histone H3 Concentration in Urosepsis: A Prospective Observational Study.Advances in therapy · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis management remains one of the most important challenges in modern clinical practice. Rapid progression from sepsis to septic shock is practically unpredictable, hence the critical need for sepsis biomarkers that can help clinicians in the management of patients to reduce the probability of a fatal outcome. Circulating nucleoproteins released during the inflammatory response to infection, including neutrophil extracellular traps, nucleosomes, and histones, and nuclear proteins like HMGB1, have been proposed as markers of disease progression since they are related to inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial damage, and impairment of the coagulation response, among other pathological features. The aim of this work was to evaluate the actual potential for decision making/outcome prediction of the most commonly proposed chromatin-related biomarkers (i.e., nucleosomes, citrullinated H3, and HMGB1). To do this, we compared different ELISA measuring methods for quantifying plasma nucleoproteins in a cohort of critically ill patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock compared to nonseptic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as to healthy subjects. Our results show that all studied biomarkers can be used to monitor sepsis progression, although they vary in their effectiveness to separate sepsis and septic shock patients. Our data suggest that HMGB1/citrullinated H3 determination in plasma is potentially the most promising clinical tool for the monitoring and stratification of septic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.