Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34576097›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Comparative Analysis of Chromatin-Delivered Biomarkers in the Monitoring of Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Pilot Study.

Jesús Beltrán-García, Juan J Manclús, Eva M García-López, Nieves Carbonell, José Ferreres, María Rodríguez-Gimillo, Concepción Garcés, Federico V Pallardó, José L García-Giménez, Ángel Montoya and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Research advances of sepsis biomarkers].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jesús Beltrán-GarcíaDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Juan J ManclúsCentro de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Eva M García-LópezDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Nieves CarbonellINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9149-0310
José FerreresINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
María Rodríguez-GimilloINCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Concepción GarcésDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9903-511X
Federico V PallardóDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-1980
José L García-GiménezDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7547-7872
Ángel MontoyaCentro de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6884-765X
Carlos Romá-MateoDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-7157
Universitat de València · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESUniversitat Politècnica de València · ES

Funding

Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona ID 100010434Generalitat Valenciana APOTIP/2017/012Generalitat Valenciana GV/2014/132Generalitat Valenciana GV/2018/127Instituto de Salud Carlos III DTS17/00132Instituto de Salud Carlos III IFI18/00015Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/01036Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI19/00994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis management remains one of the most important challenges in modern clinical practice. Rapid progression from sepsis to septic shock is practically unpredictable, hence the critical need for sepsis biomarkers that can help clinicians in the management of patients to reduce the probability of a fatal outcome. Circulating nucleoproteins released during the inflammatory response to infection, including neutrophil extracellular traps, nucleosomes, and histones, and nuclear proteins like HMGB1, have been proposed as markers of disease progression since they are related to inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial damage, and impairment of the coagulation response, among other pathological features. The aim of this work was to evaluate the actual potential for decision making/outcome prediction of the most commonly proposed chromatin-related biomarkers (i.e., nucleosomes, citrullinated H3, and HMGB1). To do this, we compared different ELISA measuring methods for quantifying plasma nucleoproteins in a cohort of critically ill patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock compared to nonseptic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), as well as to healthy subjects. Our results show that all studied biomarkers can be used to monitor sepsis progression, although they vary in their effectiveness to separate sepsis and septic shock patients. Our data suggest that HMGB1/citrullinated H3 determination in plasma is potentially the most promising clinical tool for the monitoring and stratification of septic patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkersChromatinCitrullineCohort StudiesFemaleHistonesHMGB1 ProteinHumansImmunoassayMaleMiceMiddle AgedNucleoproteinsPilot ProjectsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkersChromatinCitrullineHistonesHMGB1 ProteinNucleoproteinsbiomarkerscirculating histonesELISAHMGB1nucleosomessepsisseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID34576097
PMCPMC8465401
OpenAlexW3200259045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.