Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34575677›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021

Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.

Simona Giuratrabocchetta, Giampaolo Formisano, Adelona Salaj, Enrico Opocher, Luca Ferraro, Francesco Toti, Paolo Pietro Bianchi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simona GiuratrabocchettaDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Giampaolo FormisanoDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Adelona SalajDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Enrico OpocherDivision of General and HPB Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Luca FerraroDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Francesco TotiDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Paolo Pietro BianchiDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milano, Italy.
Ospedale San Paolo · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Santi Paolo e Carlo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision is a complex and challenging procedure due to technical and anatomical issues which could impair postoperative, oncological and functional outcomes, especially in a defined subgroup of patients. The results from recent randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery are still conflicting and trans-anal bottom-up approaches have recently been developed. Robotic surgery represents the latest consistent innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery that may potentially overcome the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy thanks to an enhanced dexterity, especially in deep narrow operative fields such as the pelvis. Results from population-based multicenter studies have shown the potential advantages of robotic surgery when compared to its laparoscopic counterpart in terms of reduced conversions, complication rates and length of stay. Costs, often advocated as one of the main drawbacks of robotic surgery, should be thoroughly evaluated including both the direct and indirect costs, with the latter having the potential of counterbalancing the excess of expenditure directly related to the purchase and maintenance of robotic equipment. Further prospectively maintained or randomized data are still required to better delineate the advantages of the robotic platform, especially in the subset of most complex and technically challenging patients from both an anatomical and oncological standpoint.

Indexed as

rectal cancerrobotic low anterior resectionrobotic surgerytotal mesorectal excision

Identifiers

PMID34575677
PMCPMC8472541
OpenAlexW3198221464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.