ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Molecular Classification Models for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Subtype Using Machine Learning.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atezolizumab in early triple-negative breast cancer: the randomized phase 3 NSABP B-59/GeparDouze trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Biomarker identification of triple negative breast cancer subtypes using machine learning.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Advancements in triple-negative breast cancer sub-typing, diagnosis and treatment with assistance of artificial intelligence : a focused review.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Heterogeneity: Characteristics and Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2024Review
- Identification of Gene Expression in Different Stages of Breast Cancer with Machine Learning.Cancers · 2024Article
- Repurposing proteasome inhibitors for improved treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.Cell death discovery · 2024Article
- Prognostic role of TEAD4 in TNBC: in-silico inhibition of the TEAD4-YAP interaction by flufenamic acid analogs.In silico pharmacology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence: opportunities and challenges in the clinical applications of triple-negative breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2023Review
- Review
- Evaluation of molecular receptors status in breast cancer using an mpMRI-based feature fusion radiomics model: mimicking radiologists' diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) lacks well-defined molecular targets and is highly heterogenous, making treatment challenging. Using gene expression analysis, TNBC has been classified into four different subtypes: basal-like immune-activated (BLIA), basal-like immune-suppressed (BLIS), mesenchymal (MES), and luminal androgen receptor (LAR). However, there is currently no standardized method for classifying TNBC subtypes. We attempted to define a gene signature for each subtype, and to develop a classification method based on machine learning (ML) for TNBC subtyping. In these experiments, gene expression microarray data for TNBC patients were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes unique to 198 known TNBC cases were identified and selected as a training gene set to train in seven different classification models. We produced a training set consisting of 719 DEGs selected from uniquely expressed genes of all four subtypes. The highest average accuracy of classification of the BLIA, BLIS, MES, and LAR subtypes was achieved by the SVM algorithm (accuracy 95-98.8%; AUC 0.99-1.00). For model validation, we used 334 samples of unknown TNBC subtypes, of which 97 (29.04%), 73 (21.86%), 39 (11.68%) and 59 (17.66%) were predicted to be BLIA, BLIS, MES, and LAR, respectively. However, 66 TNBC samples (19.76%) could not be assigned to any subtype. These samples contained only three upregulated genes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.