ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Second-Generation 3D Automated Breast Ultrasonography (Prone ABUS) for Dense Breast Cancer Screening Integrated to Mammography: Effectiveness, Performance and Detection Rates.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2023Pooled it
- Multi-parametric MRI habitat radiomics with interpretable machine learning for early prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Adjunct Automated Breast Ultrasound in Mammographic Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Study on ABUS Applicability for Rural Women With Low Health Resources in China-Large-Scale Population, Non-Opportunistic Screening.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
- A nomogram for diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules based on three-dimensional volume ultrasound.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of diagnostic performance of automatic breast ultrasound and spectral mammography as complementary methods to mammography examination.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
- New progress in imaging diagnosis and immunotherapy of breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Automated 3D Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography Programs in Dense Breast: Literature Review and Metanalysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Enhanced Detection of Suspicious Breast Lesions: A Comparative Study of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Automated Breast Ultrasound in 117 Patients with Core Needle Biopsy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Cost-effective, portable, patient-dedicated three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound for point-of-care breast cancer screening.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Role of Nuclear Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping Compared to New Alternative Imaging Methods.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Impact of the systematic introduction of tomosynthesis on breast biopsies: 10 years of results.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- A ultrasound-based radiomic approach to predict the nodal status in clinically negative breast cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In our study, we added a three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound (3D ABUS) to mammography to evaluate the performance and cancer detection rate of mammography alone or with the addition of 3D prone ABUS in women with dense breasts. Our prospective observational study was based on the screening of 1165 asymptomatic women with dense breasts who selected independent of risk factors. The results evaluated include the cancers detected between June 2017 and February 2019, and all surveys were subjected to a double reading. Mammography detected four cancers, while mammography combined with a prone Sofia system (3D ABUS) doubled the detection rate, with eight instances of cancer being found. The diagnostic yield difference was 3.4 per 1000. Mammography alone was subjected to a recall rate of 14.5 for 1000 women, while mammography combined with 3D prone ABUS resulted in a recall rate of 26.6 per 1000 women. We also observed an additional 12.1 recalls per 1000 women screened. Integrating full-field digital mammography (FFDM) with 3D prone ABUS in women with high breast density increases and improves breast cancer detection rates in a significant manner, including small and invasive cancers, and it has a tolerable impact on recall rate. Moreover, 3D prone ABUS performance results are comparable with the performance results of the supine 3D ABUS system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.