Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34575643›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021

Clinical Evaluation of Pathognomonic Salivary Protease Fingerprinting for Oral Disease Diagnosis.

Garrit Koller, Eva Schürholz, Thomas Ziebart, Andreas Neff, Roland Frankenberger, Jörg W Bartsch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Garrit KollerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstr, 35033 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-1472
Eva SchürholzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstr, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Thomas ZiebartDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Campus Marburg, Philipps University Marburg and University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Baldingerstr, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Andreas NeffDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Campus Marburg, Philipps University Marburg and University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Baldingerstr, 35033 Marburg, Germany.
Roland FrankenbergerDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Campus Marburg, Philipps University Marburg and University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Georg-Voigt-Str. 3, 35039 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5112-4463
Jörg W BartschDepartment of Neurosurgery, Philipps University Marburg, Baldingerstr, 35033 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2773-3357
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BA1606/3-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental decay (Caries) and periodontal disease are globally prevalent diseases with significant clinical need for improved diagnosis. As mediators of dental disease-specific extracellular matrix degradation, proteases are promising analytes. We hypothesized that dysregulation of active proteases can be functionally linked to oral disease status and may be used for diagnosis. To address this, we examined a total of 52 patients with varying oral disease states, including healthy controls. Whole mouth saliva samples and caries biopsies were collected and subjected to analysis. Overall proteolytic and substrate specific activities were assessed using five multiplexed, fluorogenic peptides. Peptide cleavage was further described by inhibitors targeting matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and cysteine, serine, calpain proteases (CSC). Proteolytic fingerprints, supported by supervised machine-learning analysis, were delineated by total proteolytic activity (PepE) and substrate preference combined with inhibition profiles. Caries and peridontitis showed increased enzymatic activities of MMPs with common (PepA) and divergent substrate cleavage patterns (PepE), suggesting different MMP contribution in particular disease states. Overall, sensitivity and specificity values of 84.6% and 90.0%, respectively, were attained. Thus, a combined analysis of protease derived individual and arrayed substrate cleavage rates in conjunction with inhibitor profiles may represent a sensitive and specific tool for oral disease detection.

Indexed as

caries detectionextracellular matrix degradationFRET-peptidesmetalloproteasesOral Biomarkersprotease inhibitionproteolysisreal-time protease activities

Identifiers

PMID34575643
PMCPMC8472161
OpenAlexW3197859758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.