Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34575389›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Frailty Scales for Prognosis Assessment of Older Adult Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Sergio García-Blas, Clara Bonanad, Agustín Fernández-Cisnal, Clara Sastre-Arbona, Maria-Arantzazu Ruescas-Nicolau, Jessika González D'Gregorio, Ernesto Valero, Gema Miñana, Patricia Palau, Francisco J Tarazona-Santabalbina and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frailty as a Predictor of In-Hospital Outcome in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sergio García-BlasCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1998-3735
Clara BonanadCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Agustín Fernández-CisnalCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Clara Sastre-ArbonaCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Maria-Arantzazu Ruescas-NicolauFaculty of Physiotherapy, Universitat de Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-068X
Jessika González D'GregorioCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Ernesto ValeroCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Gema MiñanaCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8777-2588
Patricia PalauCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Francisco J Tarazona-SantabalbinaGeriatrics Department, Hospital Universitario de la Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4531-1446
Vicente Ruiz RosCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.
Julio NúñezCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-7119
Juan SanchisCardiology Department, University Clinic Hospital of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0797-8709

Funding

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovasculares 16/11/00420Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI15/00837Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI17/01736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to compare the prognostic value of two different measures, the Fried's Frailty Scale (FFS) and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), following myocardial infarction (MI). We included 150 patients ≥ 70 years admitted from AMI. Frailty was evaluated on the day before discharge. The primary endpoint was number of days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) during the first 800 days. Secondary endpoints were mortality and a composite of mortality and reinfarction. Frailty was diagnosed in 58% and 34% of patients using the FFS and CFS scales, respectively. During the first 800 days 34 deaths and 137 admissions occurred. The number of DAOH decreased significantly with increasing scores of both FFS (

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctionClinical Frailty ScalefrailtyFried’s frailty score

Identifiers

PMID34575389
PMCPMC8465296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.