Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34575352›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Implementation of Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) and Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) in Polish Guidelines for Determination of Cerebral Circulatory Arrest (CCA) during Brain Death/Death by Neurological Criteria (BD/DNC) Diagnosis Procedure.

Romuald Bohatyrewicz, Joanna Pastuszka, Wojciech Walas, Katarzyna Chamier-Cieminska, Wojciech Poncyljusz, Wojciech Dabrowski, Joanna Wojczal, Piotr Luchowski, Maciej Guzinski, Elzbieta Jurkiewicz and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Romuald BohatyrewiczDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1914-826X
Joanna PastuszkaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Wojciech WalasPediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Institute of Medical Science, University of Opole, 45-040 Opole, Poland.
Katarzyna Chamier-CieminskaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Wojciech PoncyljuszDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Wojciech DabrowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0449-2375
Joanna WojczalDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.
Piotr LuchowskiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-954 Lublin, Poland.
Maciej GuzinskiDepartment of General Radiology, Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9781-2114
Elzbieta JurkiewiczDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4505-8815
Monika Bekiesinska-FigatowskaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1787-3425
Radoslaw OwczukDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3441-5162
Jerzy WaleckiDiagnostic Radiology Department, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior in Warsaw, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
Olgierd RowinskiDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.
Maciej ZukowskiDepartament of Anesthesiology Intensive Care and Acute Poisoning, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Krzysztof KuszaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Mariusz PiechotaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Centre for Artificial Extracorporeal Kidney and Liver Support, Dr W. Bieganski Regional Specialist Hospital, 91-347 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-6742
Andrzej PiotrowskiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland.
Marek MigdalDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, The Children's Memorial Health Institute, 04-730 Warsaw, Poland.
Marzena ZielinskaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Marcin SawickiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PLChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLMedical University of Lublin · PLWroclaw Medical University · PLCentral Clinical Hospital · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Opole · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) guidelines are routinely analyzed, compared and updated in the majority of countries and are later implemented as national criteria. At the same time, extensive works have been conducted in order to unify clinical procedures and to validate and implement new technologies into a panel of ancillary tests. Recently evaluated computed tomography angiography and computed tomography perfusion (CTA/CTP) seem to be superior to traditionally used digital subtraction angiography (DSA), transcranial Doppler (TCD) and cerebral perfusion scintigraphy for diagnosis of cerebral circulatory arrest (CCA). In this narrative review, we would like to demonstrate scientific evidence supporting the implementation of CTA/CTP in Polish guidelines for BD/DNC diagnosis. Research and implementation process: In the first of our base studies concerning the potential usefulness of CTA/CTP for the confirmation of CCA during BD/DNC diagnosis procedures, we showed a sensitivity of 96.3% of CTA in a group of 82 patients. CTA was validated against DSA in this report. In the second study, CTA showed a sensitivity of 86% and CTP showed a sensitivity of 100% in a group of 50 patients. In this study, CTA and CTP were validated against clinical diagnosis of BD/DNC supported by TCD. Additionally, we propose our CCA criteria for CTP test, which are based on ascertainment of cerebral blood flow (CBF) < 10 mL/100 g/min and cerebral blood volume < 1 mL/100 g in regions of interest (ROIs) localized in all brain regions. Based on our research results, CTA/CTP methods were implemented in Polish BD/DNC criteria. To our knowledge, CTP was implemented for the first time in national guidelines.

conclusionsCTA and CTP-derived CTA might be in future the tests of choice for CCA diagnosis, proper and/or Doppler pretest might significantly increase sensitivity of CTA in CCA diagnosis procedures. Whole brain CTP might be decisive in some cases of inconclusive CTA. Implementation of CTA/CTP in the Polish BD/DNC diagnosis guidelines does not show any major obstacles. We believe that in next edition of "The World Brain Death Project" CTA and CTP will be recommended as ancillary tests of choice for CCA confirmation during BD/DNC diagnosis procedures.

Indexed as

brain deathcerebral blood flowCT angiographyCT perfusiondeath by neurologic criteria

Identifiers

PMID34575352
PMCPMC8469323
OpenAlexW3200696687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.