ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021
Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumor Diagnosis, Management and Fertility Preservation in Young Women.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive ability of novel glycovariant biomarkers of CA125 and CA15-3 up to three years prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis: a population-based case-control study.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary, whole-process management of a patient with recurrent serous borderline ovarian tumor from embryo cryopreservation before re-fertility-sparing surgery to successful delivery: a case report.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinicopathological and Oncological Outcomes of Borderline Mucinous Tumours of Ovary: a Large Case Series.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Histopathology and indicators of borderline ovarian tumours with microinvasion in bitches.Veterinarni medicina · 2023Article
- Article
- Management of borderline ovarian tumors: A tertiary referral center experience in Egypt.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Conservative treatment of borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) represent about 10 to 20 percent of all epithelial tumors of the ovary. They constitute intermediate lesions between benign ovarian cysts and invasive carcinomas. They often occur in young women of reproductive age, and, albeit with a favorable prognosis, it may recur on the ipsilateral or contralateral ovary. Controversies surround the diagnostic criteria used for their assessment, and the optimal management to minimize their risk of recurrence and/or transformation into malignant carcinoma. Fertility preservation (FP) is considered a priority in the management of these patients, and studies aim at finding the safest and most effective way to help women with BOT history conceive with minimal risk. We present the experience of a single institution in managing three cases of serous BOT in young nulliparous women, followed by a thorough review of the existing literature, highlighting controversies and exploring the possible FP techniques for these women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.