Association of Continuity of General Practitioner Care with Utilisation of General Practitioner and Specialist Services in China: A Mixed-Method Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. General practitioners' perspectives on household energy insecurity across healthcare settings in Henan Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026
   Article
2. Multidimensional Evaluation of the Process of Constructing Age-Friendly Communities Among Different Aged Community Residents in Beijing, China: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025
   Article
3. A spatial feature analysis of primary health care utilization in a large city in China and its implications for family doctor contract service policy.BMC health services research · 2024
   Article
4. Barriers and facilitators of family doctor contract services in caring for disabled older adults in Beijing, China: a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as