Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574900›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Rehabilitation Process Issues and Functional Performance after Total Hip and Knee Replacement.

Alexander S Fedonnikov, Elena A Andriyanova, Anton R Kiselev, Igor A Norkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A clinical risk score enables early prediction of dissatisfaction 1 year after total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander S FedonnikovInstitute of Public Health, Health Management and Humanitarian Problems of Medicine, Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Saratov State Medical University, 410012 Saratov, Russia.
Elena A AndriyanovaInstitute of Public Health, Health Management and Humanitarian Problems of Medicine, Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Saratov State Medical University, 410012 Saratov, Russia.
Anton R KiselevInstitute of Public Health, Health Management and Humanitarian Problems of Medicine, Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Saratov State Medical University, 410012 Saratov, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3967-3950
Igor A NorkinInstitute of Public Health, Health Management and Humanitarian Problems of Medicine, Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Saratov State Medical University, 410012 Saratov, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: to ensure satisfactory outcomes in patients who have undergone total hip or knee replacement, it is crucial to prioritize postoperative rehabilitation process and its management rather than the successful surgery alone. The goal of our study was to investigate the outcomes of rehabilitation process after the total hip or knee replacement, including local orthopedic follow-up, communication with local health authorities, patients' satisfaction regarding rehabilitation, and their functional performance after the surgery. (2) Methods: the study included 523 patients who underwent total hip replacement, and 650 patients who underwent total knee replacement. All patients were surveyed via formalized phone interviews containing questions related to postoperative rehabilitation parameters and outcomes. (3) Results: in postsurgical period, nearly 70% of patients had regular local orthopedic follow-up. Lack of the latter at the local level was indicated by approximately 10% of patients, and the rest of the respondents note the practice of sporadic follow-up. Half of patients reported pains of various severity. Good physical activity (e.g., ability to walk unassisted within their residential district) was acknowledged by about a quarter of patients. Ability to walk unassisted was reported by just 54.5% of patients. (4) Conclusions: the disproportion between generally high patient satisfaction of rehabilitation management (>80%) and low feedback level on the part of local health authorities (9.4%) demonstrated lack of communication between the key parties involved in the rehabilitation process.

Indexed as

rehabilitation managementsocial surveytotal hip replacementtotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID34574900
PMCPMC8472343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.