Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574884›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Public Perceptions of COVID-19 Vaccines: Policy Implications from US Spatiotemporal Sentiment Analytics.

G G Md Nawaz Ali, Md Mokhlesur Rahman, Md Amjad Hossain, Md Shahinoor Rahman, Kamal Chandra Paul, Jean-Claude Thill, Jim Samuel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spatial Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G G Md Nawaz AliDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 61625, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5861-0475
Md Mokhlesur RahmanThe William States Lee College of Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-4574
Md Amjad HossainDepartment of Accounting, Information Systems, and Finance, Emporia State University, Emporia, KS 66801, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-7714
Md Shahinoor RahmanDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Jersey City University, Jersey City, NJ 07305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5540-3307
Kamal Chandra PaulDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8510-6805
Jean-Claude ThillDepartment of Geography and Earth Sciences and School of Data Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-8123
Jim SamuelDepartment of Business Analytics, University of Charleston, Charleston, WV 25304, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7599-3209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a compelling and pressing need to better understand the temporal dynamics of public sentiment towards COVID-19 vaccines in the US on a national and state-wise level for facilitating appropriate public policy applications. Our analysis of social media data from early February and late March 2021 shows that, despite the overall strength of positive sentiment and despite the increasing numbers of Americans being fully vaccinated, negative sentiment towards COVID-19 vaccines still persists among segments of people who are hesitant towards the vaccine. In this study, we perform sentiment analytics on vaccine tweets, monitor changes in public sentiment over time, contrast vaccination sentiment scores with actual vaccination data from the US CDC and the Household Pulse Survey (HPS), explore the influence of maturity of Twitter user-accounts and generate geographic mapping of tweet sentiments. We observe that fear sentiment remained unchanged in populous states, whereas trust sentiment declined slightly in these same states. Changes in sentiments were more notable among less populous states in the central sections of the US. Furthermore, we leverage the emotion polarity based Public Sentiment Scenarios (PSS) framework, which was developed for COVID-19 sentiment analytics, to systematically posit implications for public policy processes with the aim of improving the positioning, messaging, and administration of vaccines. These insights are expected to contribute to policies that can expedite the vaccination program and move the nation closer to the cherished herd immunity goal.

Indexed as

coronavirusCOVID-19public policyPublic Sentiment Scenarios frameworksentiment analysisspatiotemporal analysistextual analyticsTwittervaccine

Identifiers

PMID34574884
PMCPMC8465389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.