Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574870›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Defensive Medicine in the Management of Cesarean Delivery: A Survey among Italian Physicians.

Vittorio Fineschi, Mauro Arcangeli, Nicola Di Fazio, Zoe Del Fante, Benedetta Fineschi, Paola Santoro, Paola Frati, Associazione Consulcesi Health And Onlus Futura Ricerca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Maternal perspective on requesting elective caesarean birth.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Obstetric Violence from a Midwife Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Clinicians' views regarding caesarean section rates in Switzerland: A cross-sectional web-based survey.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vittorio FineschiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1686-3236
Mauro ArcangeliDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Nicola Di FazioDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Zoe Del FanteDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Benedetta FineschiAGI Medica, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Paola SantoroDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Paola FratiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0358-7965
Associazione Consulcesi Health And Onlus Futura Ricerca
Sapienza University of Rome · ITIstituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThis study aims to contribute to the definition of the defensive medicine phenomenon between obstetricians and gynecologists, as well as to possible effects on the frequency of deliveries performed by cesarean sections (CS). MATERIALS AND

methodsa digital questionnaire was administered through a mail-list including 600 gynecological specialists (of these 168 doctors completed the test), both in public and private settings. It was made of twenty multiple choice questions, concerning their awareness about the practice of defensive medicine and the planning and execution of CS. All doctors involved received clear and complete information about the purpose of this study and about the organizations that received their answers. Analyses of variance and regression were performed to describe differences between groups and to estimate the relationships between variables. The value of

resultsour analysis revealed that most respondents are confident with the defensive medicine definition and characteristics. This survey confirmed that gynecologists fear legal actions promoted by their patients and therefore modulate their choices by implementing professional behaviors of so-called "defensive medicine". This relates to a greater number of medical liability judgements, which more often concern omission or delayed execution of cesarean section, rather than unskillful surgical procedures.

conclusionsthere are few data to support a relation between the high rate of CS and defensive medicine. Numerous scientific studies associated this CS rate with the phenomenon of defensive medicine. This practice is constantly growing in all medical areas, especially in high-risk specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology. Our study highlights physicians' awareness of adopting defensive medicine behaviors in their clinical practice, affecting the choice of the type of delivery to be performed.

Indexed as

cesarean sectiondefensive medicineguidelinesinformed consentmaternal autodeterminationmedical responsibilityobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID34574870
PMCPMC8472348
OpenAlexW3193871722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.