Between- and within-Group Differences in Fruit and Vegetable Purchases, Consumption, and BMI among Hispanic Farmers' Market Shoppers Who Use SNAP.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Understanding Impacts of SNAP Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program at Farmers' Markets: Findings from a 13 State RCT.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
   Trial
2. Indicators of Household Composition Are Associated with Adherence to Fruit and Vegetable Intake Recommendations Among Caretakers Eligible for SNAP with Children.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
   Article
3. Objective and perceived barriers and facilitators of daily fruit and vegetable consumption among under-resourced communities in Central Texas.Appetite · 2022
   Article
4. Evaluating the Full Plate Living lifestyle intervention in low-income monolingual Latinas with and without food insecurity.Women's health (London, England)
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as