Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574671›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Postcoital Vaginal Perforation and Evisceration in Women with No Prior Pelvic Surgery: Laparoscopic Management and Systematic Review of the Literature.

Guglielmo Stabile, Denise Mordeglia, Federico Romano, Stefania Carlucci, Francesco Paolo Mangino, Luigi Nappi, Felice Sorrentino, Nicolò De Manzini, Giuseppe Ricci

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. New Topical Therapy for Provoked Vestibulodynia: Improvement of Psychological and Sexual Well-Being.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Women's Health and Gynecology: Old Challenges and New Insights.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. LadyliftPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Guglielmo StabileInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, 34100 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-3896
Denise MordegliaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Federico RomanoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, 34100 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2157-8330
Stefania CarlucciDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano-Isontina, San Polo Hospital, Gorizia-Mofalcone, 34127 Trieste, Italy.
Francesco Paolo ManginoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, 34100 Trieste, Italy.
Luigi NappiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-0822
Felice SorrentinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-2895
Nicolò De ManziniDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8362-9044
Giuseppe RicciInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, 34100 Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8031-1102
IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITUniversity of Trieste · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto evaluate risk factors, causes, management and surgical therapy of postcoital vaginal perforation and evisceration in women with no prior pelvic surgery. DATA SOURCES: We used MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase and Web of Science for our research. Our review includes all reports from 1980 to November 2020. The research strategy adopted included different combinations of the following terms: (intercourse) AND (coitus) AND (vaginal perforation). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: we report a case of vaginal evisceration after consensual intercourse in a young and healthy woman. In addition, we performed a systematic review of vaginal perforations with or without evisceration in women without prior surgery or any other predisposing disease. All studies identified were listed by citation, title, authors and abstract. Duplicates were identified by an independent manual screening, performed by one researcher and then removed. For the eligibility process, two authors independently screened the title and abstracts of all non-duplicated papers and excluded those not pertinent to the topic. TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND

resultsWe have followed the PRISMA guidelines. Five manuscripts were detected through the references of the works that had been identified with the research on MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. We found 16 cases between 1980 and 2020. The young age and the virginal status represent the principal risk factors and all the lacerations occurred in the posterior vaginal fornix. The most common surgical technique was the laparotomic approach and, in the remaining cases, the laparoscopic and vaginal route was performed.

conclusionsPost-coital vaginal perforation and evisceration in women with no prior pelvic surgery is a rare condition in the clinical practice and, when it is associated with evisceration it is a surgical emergency. Usually, these injuries are not life-threatening conditions but, a delay in diagnosis, can lead to severe complications. In consideration of the high heterogeneity of the data in the literature, it is essential to define a diagnostic-therapeutic management for the patients with vaginal perforation. With our review, we try to identify the associated risk factors, the best and fastest diagnosis, and the best surgical approach. We believe that a combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach can be the best surgical treatment, useful to diagnose injuries of the abdominal organs and to improve postoperative outcome.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyVaginal DiseasesCoitusFemaleHumansRuptureeviscerationlaparoscopypostcoitalsexual intercoursevaginal perforationvaginal rupture

Identifiers

PMID34574671
PMCPMC8464867
OpenAlexW3199088697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.