Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574652›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake among Black Men Who Have Sex with Men (BMSM) in the Southern U.S.

Oluwafemi Adeagbo, Sayward Harrison, Shan Qiao, Xiaoming Li

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05968755 (Leveraging Chatbot Technology to Improve PrEP Awareness and Uptake Among Black MSM in the Southern United States), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05968755 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Leveraging Chatbot Technology to Improve PrEP Awareness and Uptake Among Black MSM in the Southern United States

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled145ConditionsHIV Prevention, PrEP Awareness, PrEP UptakeArmsA chatbot designed to promote PrEP awareness and uptake for Black MSM, General educational messages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oluwafemi AdeagboSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Health Care Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1462-9275
Sayward HarrisonSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Health Care Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Shan QiaoSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Health Care Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9685-0277
Xiaoming LiSouth Carolina SmartState Center for Health Care Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5555-9034

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) living in the United States (U.S.) South are disproportionately affected by HIV and experience significant disparities in HIV incidence, access to HIV care, and prevention across ages and socio-economic statuses. The aim of this commentary is to critically review current literature on the state of PrEP use among BMSM in the U.S. South, including identifying barriers and facilitators to PrEP use in order to inform intervention development. Extant literature shows that despite the documented benefits of PrEP as an effective HIV-prevention method, its uptake among BMSM is limited across the U.S. South. Common barriers to PrEP uptake included stigma, homophobia, mistrust of healthcare systems, negative attitudes from healthcare providers, access and transportation issues, poverty, and misinformation about PrEP. These barriers are likely to have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Limited access to PrEP and other HIV-prevention programs, such as HIV testing, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and condoms for BMSM are likely increase HIV incidence in this community. Moreover, the rapid expansion of telehealth services during the COVID-19 period may offer increased opportunity to scale-up PrEP through telehealth interventions, especially if in-person services remain limited due to pandemic precautions. Given the intersectional barriers that limit the access and uptake of PrEP among BMSM, we suggest that tailored programs or interventions that seek to address PrEP disparities among Southern BMSM should adopt intersectional and interdisciplinary approaches to better understand the complex challenges of scaling up PrEP. More studies are needed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on HIV-prevention services among BMSM and to understand how to co-develop-with the BMSM community and healthcare providers-culturally acceptable interventions to reduce the identified challenges using intersectional and interdisciplinary approaches.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCOVID-19HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2United StatesAnti-HIV AgentsBMSMCOVID-19HIVPrEPSouthern statesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34574652
PMCPMC8470377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.