Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574607›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Investigating the Feasibility of a Restaurant Delivery Service to Improve Food Security among College Students Experiencing Marginal Food Security, a Head-to-Head Trial with Grocery Store Gift Cards.

Ryan J Gamba, Lana Mariko Wood, Adianez Ampil, Alina Engelman, Juleen Lam, Michael T Schmeltz, Maria M Pritchard, Joshua Kier Adrian Santillan, Esteban S Rivera, Nancy Ortiz and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Knowledge into the Practice against COVID-19: A Cross-Sectional Study from Ghana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ryan J GambaDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Lana Mariko WoodUniversity Libraries, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4379-7705
Adianez AmpilPioneers for H.O.P.E., California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5634-3729
Alina EngelmanDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Juleen LamDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Michael T SchmeltzDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Maria M PritchardDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Joshua Kier Adrian SantillanDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Esteban S RiveraDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Nancy OrtizDepartment of Public Health, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Darice IngramPioneers for H.O.P.E., California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Kate CheyneDepartment of Research, Alameda County Community Food Bank, Oakland, CA 94621, USA.
Sarah TaylorDepartment of Social Work, California State University, East Bay, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restaurant delivery services have gained in popularity among college students; however, students participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) are not allowed to redeem their benefits via restaurant delivery services. This mixed-methods head-to-head crossover trial assessed whether college students experiencing marginal food security prefer benefits via a grocery store gift card (as a proxy for traditional SNAP benefits) or via a restaurant delivery service gift card of equivalent value, and which type of benefit is more effective at improving food security status. Thirty college students experiencing marginal food security were recruited to receive $80 in cash equivalent benefits to spend over a two-month period in the form of grocery store gift cards and restaurant delivery service gift cards. Participants completed surveys and interviews to measure their food security status and share their experiences with each benefit type. After four months of benefits, 48.3% of participants improved their food security status. However, neither type of benefit was statistically better at improving food security status. Most participants preferred grocery store benefits (89.7%) over restaurant delivery service benefits (10.3%). However, more research is needed to explore whether allowing SNAP recipients to redeem their benefits with restaurant delivery services is a viable mechanism to address food challenges among college students experiencing marginal food security.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceRestaurantsFeasibility StudiesFood MarketsFood SecurityFood SupplyHumansPovertyStudentscollege studentsfood aid preferencesfood assistance interventionfood insecuritymarginal food securityrestaurant delivery servicesupplemental nutrition assistance program

Identifiers

PMID34574607
PMCPMC8465385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.