Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574593›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Comprehensive Survey on Security and Privacy for Electronic Health Data.

Se-Ra Oh, Young-Duk Seo, Euijong Lee, Young-Gab Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Exploring digital health: a qualitative study on adults' experiences with health apps and wearables.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Improving mental health care in depression: A call for action.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. User Perception of New E-Health Challenges: Implications for the Care Process.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. The Social Acceptance of Smart Health Services in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Se-Ra OhMiro Corporation, Incheon 21988, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4448-2748
Young-Duk SeoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8542-2058
Euijong LeeDepartment of Computer Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-7392
Young-Gab KimDepartment of Computer and Information Security, and Convergence Engineering for Intelligent Drone, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9585-8808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the integration of state-of-the-art technologies, such as modern sensors, networks, and cloud computing, has revolutionized the conventional healthcare system. However, security concerns have increasingly been emerging due to the integration of technologies. Therefore, the security and privacy issues associated with e-health data must be properly explored. In this paper, to investigate the security and privacy of e-health systems, we identified major components of the modern e-health systems (i.e., e-health data, medical devices, medical networks and edge/fog/cloud). Then, we reviewed recent security and privacy studies that focus on each component of the e-health systems. Based on the review, we obtained research taxonomy, security concerns, requirements, solutions, research trends, and open challenges for the components with strengths and weaknesses of the analyzed studies. In particular, edge and fog computing studies for e-health security and privacy were reviewed since the studies had mostly not been analyzed in other survey papers.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityPrivacyCloud ComputingDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health Recordscloud computingedge computinge-health datafog computingmedical devicesmedical networkssecurity concernssecurity requirementssecurity solutions

Identifiers

PMID34574593
PMCPMC8465695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.