Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574543›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Differences in Reward Sensitivity between High and Low Problematic Smartphone Use Adolescents: An ERP Study.

Xinmei Deng, Qiufeng Gao, Lijun Hu, Lin Zhang, Yanzhen Li, Xiangyu Bu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Advances in the electrophysiological research on neurocognitive function in adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xinmei DengSchool of Psychology, Normal College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Qiufeng GaoDepartment of Sociology, Law School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Lijun HuSchool of Psychology, Normal College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Lin ZhangSchool of Psychology, Normal College, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Yanzhen LiDepartment of Sociology, Law School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Xiangyu BuDepartment of Sociology, Law School, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblematic smartphone use is highly prevalent in adolescent populations compared to other age groups (e.g., adults and young children). Previous studies suggested that higher levels of reward sensitivity were associated with problematic smartphone use. Therefore, the current study investigated the neural processing of monetary and social reward and punishment feedbacks between high and low problematic smartphone use adolescents.

methods46 adolescents participated in the current study and they were categorized into two groups based on their level of problematic smartphone use: those who obtained low scores on the measure of problematic smartphone use were categorized as Low Problematic Smartphone Use (LPSU), and those who obtained high scores on the measure of problematic smartphone use were categorized as High Problematic Smartphone Use (HPSU). Electrocortical activities were recorded during the processing of monetary and social reward and punishment feedback.

results(1) LPSUs evoked larger P3 in the social punishment condition than in the monetary punishment condition. HPSUs evoked larger P3 in the social reward condition than in the monetary condition. (2) The feedback-related negativity (FRN) amplitudes in the reward condition were significantly larger than those in the punishment condition. (3) HPSUs induced larger reward positivity in social feedback conditions than in monetary feedback conditions, while there were no significant differences between the two types of conditions in the LPSUs. DISCUSSION: The results provide neural underpinning evidence that high sensitivity to social rewards may be related to problematic smartphone use in adolescence.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolHumansPunishmentRewardSmartphoneadolescentsevent-related brain potentials (ERPs)problematic smartphone usereward sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID34574543
PMCPMC8470587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.