Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574508›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Sexual Exposure to HIV Infection during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM): A Multicentric Study.

Alvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa, Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida Lima, João Victor Rocha, Herica Emilia Félix de Carvalho, Artur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes Queiroz, Guilherme Schneider, Layze Braz de Oliveira, Emerson Lucas Silva Camargo, Adélia Dalva da Silva Oliveira, Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alvaro Francisco Lopes de SousaHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Centro Universitário UNINOVAFAPI/AFYA, Piauí 64073-505, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2710-2122
Shirley Verônica Melo Almeida LimaNúcleo de Investigação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju 49100-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9062-0742
João Victor RochaEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal.
Herica Emilia Félix de CarvalhoHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5913-8886
Artur Acelino Francisco Luz Nunes QueirozHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6350-1908
Guilherme SchneiderHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4244-6217
Layze Braz de OliveiraHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.
Emerson Lucas Silva CamargoHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6119-5193
Adélia Dalva da Silva OliveiraHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Centro Universitário UNINOVAFAPI/AFYA, Piauí 64073-505, Brazil.
Isabel Amélia Costa MendesHuman Exposome and Infectious Diseases Network, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, Brazil.
Inês FronteiraGlobal Health and Tropical Medicine, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1349-008 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-4585

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 159908/2019-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The practice of sex with casual partners without the use of adequate prevention in the period of social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic among men who have sex with men (MSM) can expose them to the risk of infection by the HIV virus. To assess this, we conducted an online survey in April and May 2020 in the entire national territory of Brazil and Portugal. We used the snowball technique for sampling, associated with circulation in social networks, totaling 2934 participants. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to produce the adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR). Eight-hundred-and-forty-two (28.7%) MSM presented at-risk sexual exposure in this period. In general, the types of sexual practices that most increased the chances of sexual exposure were having multiple partners (aOR:14.045); having practiced chemsex (aOR:2.246) and group sex (aOR:2.431), as well as presenting a history of at-risk sexual exposure (aOR:5.136). When we consider each country separately, the chances are increased in Brazil since the probability of the outcome was increased in those who practiced group sex (aOR:5.928), had multiple partners (aOR:19.132), and reported a sexual history of at-risk exposure (aOR:8.861). Our findings indicate that practices that are classically associated with greater chances of engaging in risky sexual exposure to HIV infection were the factors that most increased the chances of acquiring the virus in the pandemic context.

Indexed as

COVID-19HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesCross-Sectional StudiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sexual BehaviorSexual PartnersCOVID-19HIV/AIDSmen who have sex with menSARS-CoV-2sexual behaviorsexual exposure

Identifiers

PMID34574508
PMCPMC8470798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.