Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574443›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Walking Ability Outcome Measures in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review.

Isabel Sinovas-Alonso, Ángel Gil-Agudo, Roberto Cano-de-la-Cuerda, Antonio J Del-Ama

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Derivation of the Gait Deviation Index for Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabel Sinovas-AlonsoInternational Doctoral School, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28008 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1794-4417
Ángel Gil-AgudoBiomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
Roberto Cano-de-la-CuerdaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1118-4234
Antonio J Del-AmaBiomechanics and Technical Aids Unit, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, 45071 Toledo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6215-2593
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Walking function recovery in spinal cord injury (SCI) is tackled through several therapeutic approaches in which precise evaluation is essential. A systematic review was performed to provide an updated qualitative review of walking ability outcome measures in SCI and to analyze their psychometric properties. PubMed, Cochrane, and PEDro databases were consulted until 1 April 2020. Seventeen articles written in English were included. Five of them studied the walking index for SCI, four studied the 10 meter walk test, and two studied the six-minute walk test, the timed Up and go test, and the Berg balance scale. The rest of the articles studied the following metrics: gait profile score, spinal cord injury functional ambulation profile, five times sit-to-stand test, spinal cord injury functional ambulation inventory, spinal cord independence measure (indoors and outdoors mobility items), locomotor stages in spinal cord injury, community balance and mobility scale, and activity-based balance level evaluation scale. The choice of a single or a set of metrics should be determined by the clinician. Based on the results obtained in this review, a combination of outcome measures is proposed to assess walking ability. Future work is required to integrate a more realistic environment for walking assessment.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesWalkingHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostural BalanceTime and Motion Studiesoutcome measurespsychometric propertiesspinal cord injurywalking ability

Identifiers

PMID34574443
PMCPMC8472084
OpenAlexW3198904986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.