Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34574384›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Ergonomic Risk Assessment during an Informal Hand-Made Cookware Operation: Extending an Existing Model.

Busisiwe Shezi, Renee A Street, Angela Mathee, Nokulunga Cele, Sipho Ndabandaba, Rajen N Naidoo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Busisiwe SheziEnvironment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4999-9738
Renee A StreetEnvironment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban 4000, South Africa.
Angela MatheeEnvironment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg 2094, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0060-829X
Nokulunga CeleEnvironment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban 4000, South Africa.
Sipho NdabandabaEnvironment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0762-4855
Rajen N NaidooDiscipline of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2318-4004
South African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The work conducted in the informal sector is highly variable within and between days. Characterizing ergonomic exposures remains a challenge because of unstructured work settings and schedules. The existing ergonomic risk assessment tools have been widely used in formal work settings with a narrow range of exposure, and for predefined tasks that primarily constitute a daily routine. There is limited information in the literature on how they have been applied in informal workplaces. The aim of this study was to extend an existing risk assessment tool and to evaluate the applicability of the extended tool by assessing ergonomic exposure related to hand-made cookware operations. Eighteen hand-made cookware makers were recruited from six sites. A walkthrough risk assessment questionnaire was used to collect information on workers, tasks, work stations and workplace structures. The Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) screening tool was extended by including duration and vibration. An action priority matrix was used to guide intervention. According to the RULA action levels, the workers required investigation and changes soon, and immediate investigation and changes. The use of an action priority matrix was appropriate, and indicated that all the workers assessed were within the high to very high exposure domain and required immediate corrective measures. The methodology used proved to be an effective and reliable strategy for identifying ergonomic exposure among hand-made cookware makers.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesErgonomicsHumansRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesUpper Extremityaction priority matrixergonomicshand-made cookware operationinformal workrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID34574384
PMCPMC8469040
OpenAlexW3197615346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.