ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Deep Learning for Caries Detection and Classification.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence in caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Head & face medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring a decade of deep learning in dentistry: A comprehensive mapping review.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for radiographic imaging detection of caries lesions: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Dentistry: Current Applications, Emerging Trends, and Future Directions.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- A Genetic Algorithm-Optimized ConvNeXtV2-YOLOv8 Framework for Dental Caries Detection in Panoramic Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of AI-assisted caries annotation on dental students' performance in caries detection on panoramic radiographs.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- EnamelNet-TRiX: A Lesion-Aware Dual-Transformer With Cross-Attention for Early and Advanced Enamel Caries Diagnosis.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Automated Tooth Detection and Caries Identification in CBCT With Deep Learning.International dental journal · 2026Article
- MultiDentNet: a unified deep learning framework for multi-class dental condition screening and preliminary oral lesion triage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Dental Carious Lesions in Digital Dental Radiographs: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Automated differentiation of caries requiring filling and caries necessitating root canal treatment using machine learning.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- AI-Powered Clinical Decision Support in Dentistry: Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Oral Medicine and Periodontal Diagnosis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Assessment of posterior interproximal surfaces on bitewing and panoramic radiographs by dental interns and an artificial intelligence application.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- A Lightweight and Explainable AI Framework Toward Automated Infraocclusion Detection in Pediatric Panoramic Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emerging trends in the early diagnosis of dental caries: a scoping review of artificial intelligence, digital diagnostics, and teledentistry.Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Test Characteristics of a Prototype for AI-Assisted Radiographic Detection.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- A novel Pulp Caries GAN multi loss GAN with new pulp inspired metaheuristics for pediatric dental caries detection and segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Deep Metric Learning and Multimodal Gated Fusion Framework for AI-Driven Risk Assessment of Lingual Plate Perforation and Mandibular Canal Injury in Posterior Mandible Implants.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for dental caries diagnosis: translating algorithms to clinical practice.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of a YOLOv5x-based deep learning model for interproximal caries segmentation on bitewing radiographs across primary and permanent teeth.BMC oral health · 2025Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDeep learning methods have achieved impressive diagnostic performance in the field of radiology. The current study aimed to use deep learning methods to detect caries lesions, classify different radiographic extensions on panoramic films, and compare the classification results with those of expert dentists.
methodsA total of 1160 dental panoramic films were evaluated by three expert dentists. All caries lesions in the films were marked with circles, whose combination was defined as the reference dataset. A training and validation dataset (1071) and a test dataset (89) were then established from the reference dataset. A convolutional neural network, called nnU-Net, was applied to detect caries lesions, and DenseNet121 was applied to classify the lesions according to their depths (dentin lesions in the outer, middle, or inner third D1/2/3 of dentin). The performance of the test dataset in the trained nnU-Net and DenseNet121 models was compared with the results of six expert dentists in terms of the intersection over union (IoU), Dice coefficient, accuracy, precision, recall, negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score metrics.
resultsnnU-Net yielded caries lesion segmentation IoU and Dice coefficient values of 0.785 and 0.663, respectively, and the accuracy and recall rate of nnU-Net were 0.986 and 0.821, respectively. The results of the expert dentists and the neural network were shown to be no different in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, NPV, and F1-score. For caries depth classification, DenseNet121 showed an overall accuracy of 0.957 for D1 lesions, 0.832 for D2 lesions, and 0.863 for D3 lesions. The recall results of the D1/D2/D3 lesions were 0.765, 0.652, and 0.918, respectively. All metric values, including accuracy, precision, recall, NPV, and F1-score values, were proven to be no different from those of the experienced dentists.
conclusionIn detecting and classifying caries lesions on dental panoramic radiographs, the performance of deep learning methods was similar to that of expert dentists. The impact of applying these well-trained neural networks for disease diagnosis and treatment decision making should be explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.