ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Machine Learning-Based Definition of Symptom Clusters and Selection of Antidepressants for Depressive Syndrome.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning for Comparative Antidepressant Selection in Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of Machine Learning in Discriminating Kawasaki Disease and Other Febrile Illnesses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Pursuing personalized medicine for depression by targeting the lateral or medial prefrontal cortex with Deep TMS.JCI insight · 2023Trial
- Artificial Intelligence in Multimodal Neuroimaging Research on Depression: A Bibliometric Analysis.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
- SYNERGY-VAE: An explainable generative deep learning framework for discovering depression subgroups from multimodal population health data.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Clustering Analysis of Emotional Expression, Personality Traits, and Psychological Symptoms.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Neural Activity Disparities in Deficiency and Excess Patterns of Depression: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Sex differences in the network structures of depressive symptom profiles in Asian patients with depressive disorders: findings from the Research on Asian Psychotropic Patterns for Antidepressants, Phase 3.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2025Article
- Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Major Depression: A New Therapeutic Approach.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- The Relationship between Stress, Inflammation, and Depression.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Differentiation Model for Insomnia Disorder and the Respiratory Arousal Threshold Phenotype in Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Taiwanese Population Based on Oximetry and Anthropometric Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Entorhinal Cortex and Adult Neurogenesis in Major Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current polythetic and operational criteria for major depression inevitably contribute to the heterogeneity of depressive syndromes. The heterogeneity of depressive syndrome has been criticized using the concept of language game in Wittgensteinian philosophy. Moreover, "a symptom- or endophenotype-based approach, rather than a diagnosis-based approach, has been proposed" as the "next-generation treatment for mental disorders" by Thomas Insel. Understanding the heterogeneity renders promise for personalized medicine to treat cases of depressive syndrome, in terms of both defining symptom clusters and selecting antidepressants. Machine learning algorithms have emerged as a tool for personalized medicine by handling clinical big data that can be used as predictors for subtype classification and treatment outcome prediction. The large clinical cohort data from the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D), Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcome (CO-MED), and the German Research Network on Depression (GRND) have recently began to be acknowledged as useful sources for machine learning-based depression research with regard to cost effectiveness and generalizability. In addition, noninvasive biological tools such as functional and resting state magnetic resonance imaging techniques are widely combined with machine learning methods to detect intrinsic endophenotypes of depression. This review highlights recent studies that have used clinical cohort or brain imaging data and have addressed machine learning-based approaches to defining symptom clusters and selecting antidepressants. Potentially applicable suggestions to realize machine learning-based personalized medicine for depressive syndrome are also provided herein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.