Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573963›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Automated Final Lesion Segmentation in Posterior Circulation Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Deep Learning.

Riaan Zoetmulder, Praneeta R Konduri, Iris V Obdeijn, Efstratios Gavves, Ivana Išgum, Charles B L M Majoie, Diederik W J Dippel, Yvo B W E M Roos, Mayank Goyal, Peter J Mitchell and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Riaan ZoetmulderDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Praneeta R KonduriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris V ObdeijnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Efstratios GavvesInformatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1097 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ivana IšgumDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9234-3515
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mayank GoyalRadiology, Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada.
Peter J MitchellDepartment of Radiology, The University of Melbourne & The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3050, Australia.
Bruce C V CampbellDepartment of Medicine and Neurology, Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3632-9433
Demetrius K LopesDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6280-0113
Gernot ReimannDepartment of Neurology, Community Hospital Klinikum Dortmund, 44137 Dortmund, Germany.
Tudor G JovinCooper Neurological Institute, Cooper University Medical Center, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Jeffrey L SaverDepartment of Neurology and Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Keith W MuirInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9535-022X
Phil WhiteTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Serge BracardINSERM U1254, IADI, University Hospital, Neuroradiology, 54511 Nancy, France.
Bailiang ChenINSERM CIC-IT 1433, University Hospital, 54511 Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1038-7846
Scott BrownAltair Biostatistics, St Louis Park, MN 55416, USA.
Wouter J SchonewilleSt. Antonius Hospital, 3435 Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Erik van der HoevenDepartment of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, P.O. Box 2500, 3430 Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Volker PuetzDepartment of Neurology, Dresden University Stroke Centre, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Henk A MarqueringDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Final lesion volume (FLV) is a surrogate outcome measure in anterior circulation stroke (ACS). In posterior circulation stroke (PCS), this relation is plausibly understudied due to a lack of methods that automatically quantify FLV. The applicability of deep learning approaches to PCS is limited due to its lower incidence compared to ACS. We evaluated strategies to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for PCS lesion segmentation by using image data from both ACS and PCS patients. We included follow-up non-contrast computed tomography scans of 1018 patients with ACS and 107 patients with PCS. To assess whether an ACS lesion segmentation generalizes to PCS, a CNN was trained on ACS data (ACS-CNN). Second, to evaluate the performance of only including PCS patients, a CNN was trained on PCS data. Third, to evaluate the performance when combining the datasets, a CNN was trained on both datasets. Finally, to evaluate the performance of transfer learning, the ACS-CNN was fine-tuned using PCS patients. The transfer learning strategy outperformed the other strategies in volume agreement with an intra-class correlation of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92) vs. 0.55 to 0.83 and a lesion detection rate of 87% vs. 41-77 for the other strategies. Hence, transfer learning improved the FLV quantification and detection rate of PCS lesions compared to the other strategies.

Indexed as

CTdeep learningposterior strokesegmentationtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34573963
PMCPMC8466415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.