Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34573923›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Mortality Prediction Utilizing Blood Biomarkers to Predict the Severity of COVID-19 Using Machine Learning Technique.

Tawsifur Rahman, Fajer A Al-Ishaq, Fatima S Al-Mohannadi, Reem S Mubarak, Maryam H Al-Hitmi, Khandaker Reajul Islam, Amith Khandakar, Ali Ait Hssain, Somaya Al-Madeed, Susu M Zughaier and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tawsifur RahmanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-6938-6496
Fajer A Al-IshaqDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Fatima S Al-MohannadiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Reem S MubarakDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Maryam H Al-HitmiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Khandaker Reajul IslamDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Amith KhandakarDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-7068-9112
Ali Ait HssainMedical ICU, Hamad General Hospital, Doha 3050, Qatar.
Somaya Al-MadeedDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-2899
Susu M ZughaierDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-7487-8770
Muhammad E H ChowdhuryDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-8206

Funding

Qatar National Research Fund UREP28-144-3-046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare researchers have been working on mortality prediction for COVID-19 patients with differing levels of severity. A rapid and reliable clinical evaluation of disease intensity will assist in the allocation and prioritization of mortality mitigation resources. The novelty of the work proposed in this paper is an early prediction model of high mortality risk for both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients, which provides state-of-the-art performance, in an external validation cohort from a different population. Retrospective research was performed on two separate hospital datasets from two different countries for model development and validation. In the first dataset, COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients were admitted to the emergency department in Boston (24 March 2020 to 30 April 2020), and in the second dataset, 375 COVID-19 patients were admitted to Tongji Hospital in China (10 January 2020 to 18 February 2020). The key parameters to predict the risk of mortality for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients were identified and a nomogram-based scoring technique was developed using the top-ranked five parameters. Age, Lymphocyte count, D-dimer, CRP, and Creatinine (ALDCC), information acquired at hospital admission, were identified by the logistic regression model as the primary predictors of hospital death. For the development cohort, and internal and external validation cohorts, the area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.987, 0.999, and 0.992, respectively. All the patients are categorized into three groups using ALDCC score and death probability: Low (probability < 5%), Moderate (5% < probability < 50%), and High (probability > 50%) risk groups. The prognostic model, nomogram, and ALDCC score will be able to assist in the early identification of both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients with high mortality risk, helping physicians to improve patient management.

Indexed as

biomarkerscoagulopathyCOVID-19D-dimermachine learning

Identifiers

PMID34573923
PMCPMC8469072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.