ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Structured Reporting of Lung Cancer Staging: A Consensus Proposal.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structured Versus Non-Structured Reporting of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Imaging: A Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Radiomic Analysis and Liquid Biopsy in Preoperative CT of NSCLC: An Explorative Experience.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Software-assisted structured reporting and semi-automated TNM classification for NSCLC staging in a multicenter proof of concept study.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Prognostic Value of Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology-update 2023.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Radiation Recall Pneumonitis: The Open Challenge in Differential Diagnosis of Pneumonia Induced by Oncological Treatments.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Structured reporting of computed tomography in the polytrauma patient assessment: a Delphi consensus proposal.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Risk Assessment and Cholangiocarcinoma: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence.Biology · 2023Review
- Preliminary Experience of Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer Compared to Conventional Assessment: Light and Shadows.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Structured Reporting in Radiological Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Complications Risk Assessment and Imaging Findings of Thermal Ablation Treatment in Liver Cancers: What the Radiologist Should Expect.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- The value of AI in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis of Malignant Lung Cancer.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Review
- Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Quantitative Analysis of Residual COVID-19 Lung CT Features: Consistency among Two Commercial Software.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructured reporting (SR) in radiology is becoming necessary and has recently been recognized by major scientific societies. This study aimed to build CT-based structured reports for lung cancer during the staging phase, in order to improve communication between radiologists, members of the multidisciplinary team and patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsA panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A modified Delphi exercise was used to build the structural report and to assess the level of agreement for all the report sections. The Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to perform a quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation.
resultsThe final SR version was built by including 16 items in the "Patient Clinical Data" section, 4 items in the "Clinical Evaluation" section, 8 items in the "Exam Technique" section, 22 items in the "Report" section, and 5 items in the "Conclusion" section. Overall, 55 items were included in the final version of the SR. The overall mean of the scores of the experts and the sum of scores for the structured report were 4.5 (range 1-5) and 631 (mean value 67.54, STD 7.53), respectively, in the first round. The items of the structured report with higher accordance in the first round were primary lesion features, lymph nodes, metastasis and conclusions. The overall mean of the scores of the experts and the sum of scores for staging in the structured report were 4.7 (range 4-5) and 807 (mean value 70.11, STD 4.81), respectively, in the second round. The Cronbach's alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was 0.89 in the first round and 0.92 in the second round for staging in the structured report.
conclusionsThe wide implementation of SR is critical for providing referring physicians and patients with the best quality of service, and for providing researchers with the best quality of data in the context of the big data exploitation of the available clinical data. Implementation is complex, requiring mature technology to successfully address pending user-friendliness, organizational and interoperability challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.