ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Method for Detecting and Analyzing Facial Features of People with Drug Use Disorders.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Explainable illicit drug abuse prediction using hematological differences.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Drug use disorders caused by illicit drug use are significant contributors to the global burden of disease, and it is vital to conduct early detection of people with drug use disorders (PDUD). However, the primary care clinics and emergency departments lack simple and effective tools for screening PDUD. This study proposes a novel method to detect PDUD using facial images. Various experiments are designed to obtain the convolutional neural network (CNN) model by transfer learning based on a large-scale dataset (9870 images from PDUD and 19,567 images from GP (the general population)). Our results show that the model achieved 84.68%, 87.93%, and 83.01% in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in the dataset, respectively. To verify its effectiveness, the model is evaluated on external datasets based on real scenarios, and we found it still achieved high performance (accuracy > 83.69%, specificity > 90.10%, sensitivity > 80.00%). Our results also show differences between PDUD and GP in different facial areas. Compared with GP, the facial features of PDUD were mainly concentrated in the left cheek, right cheek, and nose areas (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.